Re: [silk] Etiquette here

2009-10-03 Thread Rajesh Kumar
Hi Doc, > Welcome aboard. Nice to see you out here. Thanks. Quite a few known people here! -- Regards, trrk (Rajesh, Alleppey, Kerala

Re: [silk] Etiquette here

2009-10-03 Thread Dr. John Marshall Johnson
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Rajesh Kumar wrote: > Hi, > trrk (Rajesh) Hi TRRK, Welcome aboard. Nice to see you out here. johnson

Re: [silk] Etiquette here

2009-10-01 Thread Rajesh Kumar
Hi Deepa, > I'm still waiting for the answer to "why did you give up the practice of medicine, given that it is at least five years of rigorous training?" You may have missed that mail among the other important ones. Since I am not aware of a way of pointing to another mail in Gmail, please take

Re: [silk] Etiquette here

2009-09-30 Thread Abhijit Menon-Sen
At 2009-09-30 20:30:37 +0530, mohande...@gmail.com wrote: > > Rajesh, another important rule here (sometimes breached!) is..no > ad hominem. Ridicule an opinion but not the person expressing it. I wish everyone understood that rule as well as you do. It always annoys me when someone uses it (m

Re: [silk] Etiquette here

2009-09-30 Thread Salil Tripathi
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Deepa Mohan wrote: >> >> >> > There are only three 'r's in errors. >> > > > No, if you hesitate and make a mistake it's errror or as many > ..errr...r's (don't spell it any other way) as you hesitate. > > To err is human, to er-er is unforgivable. Salil

Re: [silk] Etiquette here

2009-09-30 Thread .
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 20:45, Deepa Mohan wrote: >> >> >> > There are only three 'r's in errors. >> > medicine, given that it is at least five years of  rigorous training?" as it has only 2 r's -- .

Re: [silk] Etiquette here

2009-09-30 Thread Deepa Mohan
> > > > There are only three 'r's in errors. > No, if you hesitate and make a mistake it's errror or as many ..errr...r's (don't spell it any other way) as you hesitate. And who knows, a "numerologist" or a "nameologist" may ask Rajesh to become Rajesh Rajesh, another important

Re: [silk] Etiquette here

2009-09-30 Thread Indrajit Gupta
--- On Wed, 30/9/09, Rajesh Kumar wrote: > From: Rajesh Kumar > Subject: Re: [silk] Etiquette here > To: silklist@lists.hserus.net > Date: Wednesday, 30 September, 2009, 4:16 PM > Hi, > > > Anything for an old friend. > > Thanks. > > > There are only

Re: [silk] Etiquette here

2009-09-30 Thread Rajesh Kumar
Hi, > Anything for an old friend. Thanks. > There are only three 'r's in errors. Thanks again. 'Vadi koduthu adi medikkuka', they say in Malayalam. Essentially it means give ammunition to the person who would be hitting / harming you. -- Regards, trrk (Rajesh, Alleppey, Kerala

Re: [silk] Etiquette here

2009-09-30 Thread Venkat Mangudi
Indrajit Gupta wrote: > Shiv is NOT a round. Shiv is a cube. Just because Shiv's not "around", you cannot call him a cube. You could call him cool, though, when he is not talking anatomy or religious politics. :)

Re: [silk] Etiquette here

2009-09-30 Thread Indrajit Gupta
--- On Wed, 30/9/09, Venkat Mangudi wrote: > From: Venkat Mangudi > Subject: Re: [silk] Etiquette here > To: silklist@lists.hserus.net > Date: Wednesday, 30 September, 2009, 1:36 PM > Rajesh Kumar wrote: > > This group is the first where I am communicating >

Re: [silk] Etiquette here

2009-09-30 Thread Indrajit Gupta
--- On Wed, 30/9/09, Rajesh Kumar wrote: > From: Rajesh Kumar > Subject: [silk] Etiquette here > To: silklist@lists.hserus.net > Date: Wednesday, 30 September, 2009, 1:28 PM > Hi, > > Other than the way CiX handled messages, I am familiar > mainly with web based >

Re: [silk] Etiquette here

2009-09-30 Thread Venkat Mangudi
Rajesh Kumar wrote: > This group is the first where I am communicating through the email method. > > Moreover I have not had the time to go through the archives and so am not > fully familiar with the routine here. There is no crazy rules here... except some basic rules that Udhay has pointed out

[silk] Etiquette here

2009-09-30 Thread Rajesh Kumar
Hi, Other than the way CiX handled messages, I am familiar mainly with web based egroups and my usual way is to read and write on the web page itself. This group is the first where I am communicating through the email method. Moreover I have not had the time to go through the archives and so am