On 16/11/06, Kiran Jonnalagadda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 16/Nov/2006, at 11:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I believe that one of the parents has to be of Indian origin as the
> constitution spells it out for a person to be considered an Indian.
Yes, but if Wikipedia has it right, that r
On 16/Nov/2006, at 11:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that one of the parents has to be of Indian origin as the
constitution spells it out for a person to be considered an Indian.
Yes, but if Wikipedia has it right, that rule came into effect only
for people born on or after July
Jace:
I believe that one of the parents has to be of Indian origin as the
constitution spells it out for a person to be considered an Indian.
As far as I know many Tibetans in India hold what is called a refugee
document...it is often referred to as the white passport.
Ironically th
Curious are the ways of the country's security apparatus. Even more
curious: how could a man born in India not be an Indian citizen, when
the constitution grants him that right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_citizenship#Citizenship_by_Birth
(While Tenzin's birth year is unknown, he can
