I think the common denominator is that the silverlon, CS and jewelry is
actually in contact with a limited amount of, but some, liquid in the cut,
wound, or etc just enough to cause the ionic reaction..
That would fall into line with the ionic transfer in the presence of a
liquid..right?
ciao
I think the common denominator is that the silverlon, CS and jewelry is
actually in contact with a limited amount of, but some, liquid in the cut,
wound, or etc just enough to cause the ionic reaction..
That would fall into line with the ionic transfer in the presence of a
liquid..right?
ciao
Listers.
Someone gave a url like this: http//algeabar.com
It's actually http//www.algaebar.com
On a side issue, I've noticed several people making
the statement that silver is only effective in a
liquid medium.
Yet I heard (couldn't confirm) that the Chinese used
to advise holding or tying
There is a difference between surface, and volume. The reference to liquid
is for volume, not surface. The thing is that a silver particle must come
in physical contact with the pathogen to kill it. If you have an infection
on the surface or topically, then a silver coin or bandage can make
4 matches
Mail list logo