Re: CS>Re[2]: CS>GMO ACTION ALERTS

2002-04-25 Thread Gary Green
On Friday, April 26, 2002, at 09:05 AM, John Reeder wrote: Don't drink cow milk, it's not produced for humans. And at a certain age humans shouldn't drink milk either. Try water with CS in it, better for your health. TRUTH! But it doesn't taste as good in my cappucino. :-D Gary. -- The

RE: CS>Re[2]: CS>GMO ACTION ALERTS

2002-04-25 Thread John Reeder
fe is campaigning to make me quit the coffee. John -Original Message- From: Malcolm Stebbins [mailto:s...@asis.com] Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 9:24 PM To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CS>Re[2]: CS>GMO ACTION ALERTS Hi John; I believe this is true for a segment of the

Re: CS>Re[2]: CS>GMO ACTION ALERTS

2002-04-25 Thread Malcolm Stebbins
ans > shouldn't drink milk either. Try water with CS in it, better for your > health. > > John > > -Original Message- > From: Malcolm Stebbins [mailto:s...@asis.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 3:12 PM > To: silver-list@eskimo.com > Subject:

RE: CS>Re[2]: CS>GMO ACTION ALERTS

2002-04-25 Thread John Reeder
To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CS>Re[2]: CS>GMO ACTION ALERTS As an addendum to this indictment of Monsanto, consider their attempt to make labeling of milk produced from cows shot up - OR NOT - with recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) into a crime. Their thrust was not merely to m

Re: CS>Re[2]: CS>GMO ACTION ALERTS

2002-04-25 Thread Malcolm Stebbins
As an addendum to this indictment of Monsanto, consider their attempt to make labeling of milk produced from cows shot up - OR NOT - with recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) into a crime. Their thrust was not merely to make it unnecessary to do so, but a criminal act for any seller of milk

Re: CS>Re[2]: CS>GMO ACTION ALERTS

2002-04-25 Thread Marshall Dudley
Ode Coyote wrote: > There must have been more to it that just that, like maybe, he was under > contract with Monsanto on some portion of his property and violated some > clause in that contract?..or he really did rip off something or did use > second generation Monsanto seeds and used a plausabl

Re: CS>Re[2]: CS>GMO ACTION ALERTS

2002-04-25 Thread Ode Coyote
There must have been more to it that just that, like maybe, he was under contract with Monsanto on some portion of his property and violated some clause in that contract?..or he really did rip off something or did use second generation Monsanto seeds and used a plausable excuse to hide it? Peopl

RE: CS>Re[2]: CS>GMO ACTION ALERTS

2002-04-24 Thread Heather King (LCA)
- From: Ode Coyote [mailto:coy...@alltel.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:18 AM To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CS>Re[2]: CS>GMO ACTION ALERTS Reqardless of what Monsanto might be selling, the farmer does not have to buy it. He can plant any seeds he wants t

RE: CS>Re[2]: CS>GMO ACTION ALERTS

2002-04-24 Thread James Osbourne, Holmes
Did he sue for contamination of his crops by Monsanto genes? James-Osbourne: Holmes -Original Message- From: Marshall Dudley [mailto:mdud...@execonn.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:01 PM To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject:Re: CS>Re[2]: CS>GMO ACTION

Re: CS>Re[2]: CS>GMO ACTION ALERTS

2002-04-24 Thread Marshall Dudley
Actually there are problems even with that. In Canada a farmer was sued because he was using his own seeds, and some of Monsanto's pollen from another farm blew in, so his crop was a hybrid with Monsanto's genes in it. They tested it, found some of their patented genes, sued and won! Also thro

Re: CS>Re[2]: CS>GMO ACTION ALERTS

2002-04-24 Thread Ode Coyote
Reqardless of what Monsanto might be selling, the farmer does not have to buy it. He can plant any seeds he wants to. Ken How about this one. Just a handful of companies can control the food supply of the world, and the ultimate pricing of such. Using "terminator technology", all seeds produced by