Marsha Hallett wrote:
>
> >Ignore THIS, Marsha.
> > har har har...
> >James Osbourne Holmes
>
> I did! heehee...
> Marsha, the proponent of utter simplification and the eschewal of
> unnecessary obfuscation...
>
Very interesting said the cow as she contemplated jumping over the
moon.
We have
>Ignore THIS, Marsha.
> har har har...
>James Osbourne Holmes
I did! heehee...
Marsha, the proponent of utter simplification and the eschewal of
unnecessary obfuscation...
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
To join or quit silver-list or silver-diges
Ignore THIS, Marsha.
har har har...
James Osbourne Holmes
a...@trail.com
-Original Message-
From: Marsha Hallett [SMTP:liah...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 1:09 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject:Re: CS>Standardization - A Call for Standards!
&g
>As a newbie, I can see that having some sort of even loose standards
viewable
>on one site would be most helpful.
>I picked the above excerpt because, after reading it, I wondered what was
the
>effect of using ingots as opposed to smaller and/or thinner electrodes.
Does
>more exposed silver surfac
dd...@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 9/26/99 10:29:00 PM Central Daylight Time, i...@win.co.nz
> writes:
>
> << I think that locking down a configuration is good, but that all
> possible combinations should be looked at, especially those that
> require no testing apparatus by the user. A
In a message dated 9/26/99 10:29:00 PM Central Daylight Time, i...@win.co.nz
writes:
<< I think that locking down a configuration is good, but that all
possible combinations should be looked at, especially those that
require no testing apparatus by the user. Agreed that the basic
8oz tumbler a
.net]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 12:47 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>Standardization - A Call for Standards!
> [hanna's PWT] looks like the one.
Ahh, good! Glad you think so. Saves you some money, too.
> 0 - 99.9uS = 0 - 100 ppm as silver.
> It
: Monday, September 27, 1999 12:45 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>Standardization - A Call for Standards!
Yes Mike,
That looks like the one. 0 - 99.9uS = 0 - 100 ppm as silver.
It turns out (as far as I can determine) that ppm as silver is almost
equal to the reading
> [hanna's PWT] looks like the one.
Ahh, good! Glad you think so. Saves you some money, too.
> 0 - 99.9uS = 0 - 100 ppm as silver.
> It turns out (as far as I can determine) that ppm as silver is
> almost equal to the reading in uS/cm^2 in water. I don't know why I
> haven't noticed this before!
y reading.
Some confirmation is required I guess, but I am confident that this
will save me some work :-)
Cheers - Ivan.
- Original Message -
From: M. G. Devour
To:
Sent: Monday, 27 September 1999 12:09
Subject: Re: CS>Standardization - A Call for Standards!
> >
> > Th
07 AM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>Standardization - A Call for Standards!
- Original Message -
From: Victoria Welch
To: Silver-List
Sent: Sunday, 26 September 1999 13:15
Subject: Re: CS>Standardization - A Call for Standards!
> Hello Bob and All,
Hi there,
>
> The Conmet 1 (HI 98305) would be the unit of choice at $142.00
> http://www.hannainst.com/products/testers/conmet.htm
> But more likely the DiST 3 at the miserly sum of $46.70
> http://www.hannainst.com/products/testers/distw.htm
>
Ivan!!
Check out the Hanna PWT (Pure Water Tester) and se
- Original Message -
From: Victoria Welch
To:
Sent: Monday, 27 September 1999 10:03
Subject: Re: CS>Standardization - A Call for Standards!
> Good Morning Ivan,
Hi Victoria,
> First off apologies to everyone for the abysmal formatting of
the
> origninal message here.
Good Morning Ivan,
First off apologies to everyone for the abysmal formatting of the
origninal message here. Not sure how it happened :(.
> Are you saying that you need to know what the silver content is
> of a particular set of generating parameters?
> What doseages are useful for what is an e
Hope all you techies respond to this call for standardization. Then I
can cope technically also. It will be so-o-o much simpler.
Victoria Welch wrote:
>
> Hello Bob and All,
>
> > It's pot stirring time again!!!
>
> :) and bringing my pot HUGE stirrer along also :-).
>
> > The only perso
- Original Message -
From: Victoria Welch
To: Silver-List
Sent: Sunday, 26 September 1999 13:15
Subject: Re: CS>Standardization - A Call for Standards!
> Hello Bob and All,
Hi there,
> > It's pot stirring time again!!!
>
> :) and bringing my pot
Hello Bob and All,
> It's pot stirring time again!!!
:) and bringing my pot HUGE stirrer along also :-).
> The only person on this list besides myself that I know is doing any
> work on understanding this process is Vikki Welch.
Well, I am trying in the interest of *knowing what it is with
17 matches
Mail list logo
