But is probably 20 uS..which would likely drop back to around 14 uS
where the uS and PPM numbers are about the same.
Ode
At 12:25 PM 6/17/2009 -0500, you wrote:
Plugging those numbers into my Excel Faraday calculator I get about
14ppm - not 20ppm.
Dan
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:54 AM, M
On the other hand, it is possible that any silver that collects on the
negative electrode may require, after polarity has been switched, that
the same amount of current be used to release it from the electrode as
if it had been originally part of that electrode...
Dan
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:1
Plugging those numbers into my Excel Faraday calculator I get about
14ppm - not 20ppm.
Dan
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Marshall Dudley wrote:
> That may be true for batch processing, but for my flow system, the
> efficiency is about 1/4 of that. That is with stirring and polarity
> reversal
Marshall Dudley wrote:
That may be true for batch processing, but for my flow system, the
efficiency is about 1/4 of that. That is with stirring and polarity
reversal. The exact stats are 1.5 gallon per hour, 20 mA and 20 ppm.
This is probably due to the higher concentration tending to plate b
That may be true for batch processing, but for my flow system, the
efficiency is about 1/4 of that. That is with stirring and polarity
reversal. The exact stats are 1.5 gallon per hour, 20 mA and 20 ppm.
This is probably due to the higher concentration tending to plate back
out during the brew
With polarity shifting there are a few seconds per cycle that don't do
much as the electrochemistry reverses.
If I recall, the current stays constant, but the voltage makes a swing, so
the EIS chemistry shifting may be "delivering" current like a battery for a
few seconds.
If the shift freq
The point is, in this case, electrode size doesn't matter. If you are
conducting at the rate of 1ma and the volume of water is 1 cup, then
you release enough silver into the water in 1 hour hour to have an
equivalent of 17 ppm. This gives you a rule by which you can get a
ballpark idea of what ma
At 12:56 PM 6/15/2009 -0500, you wrote:
Missed something...
That is "in a time period of 1 hour."
Dan
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Dan Nave wrote:
> Two gallons is probably too much to brew at one time with most of the
> home generators we see.
> You would be better off starting out with
At 09:22 AM 6/15/2009 -0400, you wrote:
My first question is, how long should I leave the process brewing and does
it take longer if I am making 2 gallons at a time? do I ever need to get
new silver leads and when should I? I just wiped my silver leads with a
clean paper towel is that okay? how
Could the folks that have their emails set for everyone to acknowledge the
receipt of their message please change their settings?
Samala,
Renee
---Original Message---
Thank you for the tip
--Original Message-
From: Dan Nave [mailto:bhangcha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 1:55 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>How do I successfully create CS? >Shelf-life of CS "My very
first Batch"
Two gallons is probably too much to brew at one time with mo
Missed something...
That is "in a time period of 1 hour."
Dan
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Dan Nave wrote:
> Two gallons is probably too much to brew at one time with most of the
> home generators we see.
> You would be better off starting out with a pint or a quart. (approx.
> 500 to 1000m
Two gallons is probably too much to brew at one time with most of the
home generators we see.
You would be better off starting out with a pint or a quart. (approx.
500 to 1000ml)
My rule of thumb is that the maximum amount of silver released into 1
cup of water at 1 milliamp current is equivalent
It all depends on your generator. I have a Silver Puppy and I make up to 32
ounces at a time. The SP has a reverse polarity function which I use
because you get almost no crud in the water but it takes longer to brew
using this method. Mine takes approximately 9 to 10 hours to make this
amount b
14 matches
Mail list logo