Hi,
I am a networking guy and the Linux way seems more natural to me. First there
is a bridge. That bridge bridges some interfaces, one of which may be the local
os.
Nowadays it is all VMs anyway, and all interfaces are bridges to connect
/disconnect the VMs on the fly. Same as simh.
I ha
> On Mar 4, 2016, at 1:41 PM, Rhialto wrote:
>
> On Fri 04 Mar 2016 at 18:10:18 +0100, Peter Svensson wrote:
>> Bridged virtual interfaces is what you use for other virtual machines,
>> why not simh?
>
> Linux has the EXTREME annoyance that once you connect an interface to a
> bridge, it stops
On Fri 04 Mar 2016 at 18:10:18 +0100, Peter Svensson wrote:
> Bridged virtual interfaces is what you use for other virtual machines,
> why not simh?
Linux has the EXTREME annoyance that once you connect an interface to a
bridge, it stops being usable as an "internet endpoint". In other words,
your
Wait, so you think it's easier to have to setup the bridge, and all
associated activities to that, and then setup the interface in simh,
compared to just setup the interface in simh?
How do you figure that?
Johnny
On 2016-03-04 18:10, Peter Svensson wrote:
I have always found the tap
> I have always found the tap+bridge style easier than pcap. It works just
> as you would expect a separate computer to work.
Once you’ve got the network structure setup the simh commands are certainly
simple and it works (at least for Wired Ethernet).
> With pcap I was never sure what happened
I have always found the tap+bridge style easier than pcap. It works just as you
would expect a separate computer to work. With pcap I was never sure what
happened when talking to the local computer.
Bridged virtual interfaces is what you use for other virtual machines, why not
simh?
Peter
Joshua,
PLEASE consider Scott's configuration as advanced configuration details
that you may want to deploy when you are polishing up what you're putting
together. DO NOT start with this stuff. Start with basic pcap networking
and migrate your existing system environment to a simh instance and
Sigh. No matter how many times I re-read before sending, it doesn't matter.
Let me expand on this:
>1. in /etc/rc.local, I have this snippet to make sure the network tap device
>I
>need is ready to go:
>
>if ! ip link show tap0 ; then
> tunctl -t tap0
> ifconfig tap0 up
> brctl addif br0 tap0
I agree with everything Mark said. (Particularly installing libpcap-dev...)
I'm running a simh VAX 8650 on Debian stretch (although nothing has changed
appreciably of late except maybe systemd); here are some additional
operational notes that you might or might not find useful -- these are about
All --
First, while watching the Bo'Sox game last night, I did a quick look @ the
document, took off the binding and started to scan it. I am about 1/2-3/4
way through the scanning process. I know there were a few errors with
miss-feeds in my HP scanner, so I'm going to look at each page before
Hi Joshua,
When reporting a problem and asking for help more detail is always better than
less.
Please be sure that you’re building the latest code from
https://github.com/simh/simh which can be downloaded as a zipball from
https://github.com/simh/simh/archive/master.zip or a tarball from
htt
On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 08:36:46 +
Joshua Overmiller wrote:
> I'm having errors attaching the XQ controller to eth0.
Post config and messages.
> Note: I'm using Debian Jessie.
Should work fine.
> I also had problems when trying to make the simh targets. I got an error
> from the make file abo
I'm having errors attaching the XQ controller to eth0.
Note: I'm using Debian Jessie.
I also had problems when trying to make the simh targets. I got an error
from the make file about statically linking against libpcap.
I...removed the check from the makefile and built it anyways. Did I do a
bad
13 matches
Mail list logo
