Hi again,
Thinking about this, I think I am ok with removing the TLS if it makes your
life easier as it looks
like you are de-facto maintainer(?).
Can anybody explain why the TLS should be removed... What is exactly the
problem and why it is better to throw them away? Ok, it is dead and
at
Hey,
> Tracing contains no information of values written to memory or registers. So
> tracing only contains the stack information and the pc. That's not what I
> need :-)
> And the "trace output dump bla bla manager" is much stuff to replace a cout.
> I have no idea what is the intention to mak
Hey Thomas,
Am 21.02.2016 um 20:55 schrieb Thomas K:
> Hi Onno,
>
>> I am not sure whether the tiny15 is still in the current code base - is it?
>
>
> Isn't in code base. :-) How complete is your implementation?
Not complete. AFAIR the pins/ports and timer worked but the ADC was missing.
Thi
Hi again :-)
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Februar 2016 um 17:53 Uhr
> Von: "Thomas K"
> An: simulavr-devel@nongnu.org
> Betreff: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Settings for stackpointer
>
> @Klaus: maybe tiny11/12/15 was implemented in the "old" version 0.1.2.6?
I know that I wrote a 3 level stack sometimes
Hi guys,
don't worry ...
@Klaus: maybe tiny11/12/15 was implemented in the "old" version 0.1.2.6?
It wasn't since I'm "on board"! And with the source control system it's easy to
check ... So, I don't agree, that so many features are dropped! I think, it
should
mean, that many things are added .
Am 23.02.2016 um 02:06 schrieb Petr Hluzín:
> It is about those tiny parts we are talking about.
We talk here about dropping working portions of the simulator in general.
> Experiments with algorithms are done on the beefiest MCU/CPU available
> because it is more convenient and author is not co
Can we please stop having meta discussions here!
If we have a design problem in simulavr which makes it hard to implement
variants of features, we should fix this. But overwriting features with other
features is not longer acceptable. There are enough features which are lost in
the last time wi
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Februar 2016 um 01:16 Uhr
> Von: "Petr Hluzín"
> An: "Klaus Rudolph"
> Cc: "Joerg Wunsch" , Simulavr-devel
>
> Betreff: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Settings for stackpointer
>
> Simulavr does not implement a device that would use the three-level
> stack. The code ThreeLevel
