On Mon Oct 12 13:25 , Joel Sherrill sent:
>henne...@cableone.net wrote:
>> I don't quite know what I'm doing.
>> The conversion tools want a local repository.
>> I eventually tried to get one with this command:
>>
>> rsync -av cvs.sv.nongnu.org::sources/simulavr/ .
>>
>> From the files listed, I
henne...@cableone.net wrote:
On Wed Sep 30 10:51 , "henne...@cableone.net" sent:
IIRC, for one who knows what he is doing,
conversion from CVS to subversion or git is trivial.
I don't quite know what I'm doing.
The conversion tools want a local repository.
I eventually tried to get o
On Wed Sep 30 10:51 , "henne...@cableone.net" sent:
>IIRC, for one who knows what he is doing,
>conversion from CVS to subversion or git is trivial.
I don't quite know what I'm doing.
The conversion tools want a local repository.
I eventually tried to get one with this command:
rsync -av cvs.sv
Hi,
> To convert the current CVS repo, why would Onno's repo be involved?
Just a very short note here. Thomas already said it, but I think I should
clearly state it again, as it think there is some confusion about what
essentially the git repo contains:
There is a branch called cvs-upstream in t
On Wed Sep 30 13:16 , ThomasK sent:
>Hi Michael,
>
>> Onno:
>> Would you make subversion and git copies of the current
>> CVS repo on your machine and make an announcement?
>> Once that is done, the discussion can be in terms
>> of what we want instead of how hard it is to get it.
>
>Maybe I woul
t; Cc: 'Joerg Wunsch'; 'Joel Sherrill'
> Subject: RE: [Simulavr-devel] Discussion: how to proceed
> withthedeveloment on GIT repo?
>
> >This is why I'm more than happy to add people to the project
> as developers or
> admins, as long as these overarchi
t; Cc: 'Joerg Wunsch'; 'Joel Sherrill'
> Subject: RE: [Simulavr-devel] Discussion: how to proceed
> withthedeveloment on GIT repo?
>
> IIRC, for one who knows what he is doing,
> conversion from CVS to subversion or git is trivial.
Good, then. :-)
Hi Michael,
Onno:
Would you make subversion and git copies of the current
CVS repo on your machine and make an announcement?
Once that is done, the discussion can be in terms
of what we want instead of how hard it is to get it.
Maybe I would have more time for it to do that, than Onno. (as I a
Hi Michael,
to answer one question:
Have you made changes to the regression test organization?
I might need to.
I have (of course in the git repo!) fixed a bug in regression test, also
added some new tests outside of the code regression test and too made
some in Makefile.am and configure.ac
On Wed Sep 30 0:53 , "Weddington, Eric" sent:
>Honetly though, I think that the continued discussion about which VCS to use is
a big distraction. It's more important to move simulavr forward, and the VCS is
just a tool to help us keep track of the code. I don't care which one is used:
CVS, SVN, o
2009 12:57 AM
>> To: simulavr-devel@nongnu.org; Onno Kortmann
>> Cc: wedding...@csogate.cso.atmel.com; Weddington, Eric;
>> henne...@cableone.net; 'Joerg Wunsch'
>> Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Discussion: how to proceed
>> withthedeveloment on GIT repo?
>>
>&
Joerg Wunsch'
> Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Discussion: how to proceed
> withthedeveloment on GIT repo?
>
> On Tue Sep 29 14:02 , Onno Kortmann sent:
>
> >What is the official review process for patches here? I
> asked about my changes
> >on the ML but as e
On Tue Sep 29 14:02 , Onno Kortmann sent:
>Hi,
>> > My concern isn't so much what VCS we use as what
>> > happens with the code in Onno's repository.
>As long as there is no consensus, I'll keep it on github.com. I clearly marked
>it as 'unofficial'.
My expectation is that at least some of the
Hi,
> > My concern isn't so much what VCS we use as what
> > happens with the code in Onno's repository.
As long as there is no consensus, I'll keep it on github.com. I clearly marked
it as 'unofficial'.
> Is Onno seeing these posts? Is on the CC list?
I am subscribed to the mailing list.
For t
vel@nongnu.org; Joerg Wunsch
> Cc: henne...@cableone.net
> Subject: Re: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Discussion: how to proceed
> withthedeveloment on GIT repo?
>
> On Mon Sep 28 3:17 , Joerg Wunsch sent:
>
> >I'm willing to help with the migration, as I've already g
vel@nongnu.org; Joerg Wunsch
> Subject: Re: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Discussion: how to proceed
> withthedeveloment on GIT repo?
>
> Changing from CVS certainly is not required.
> My suggestion was based on the following premises:
> There has been a lot of work done that for some
e.net; simulavr-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: RE: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Discussion: how to proceed
> withthedeveloment on GIT repo?
>
>
>
> If the problem is getting patches into the official
> repository, then let's address the root of the problem, and
> not jus
17 matches
Mail list logo
