Re: [singularity] Re: Intuitive limits of applied CogPsy

2006-09-22 Thread Nathan Barna
Samantha Atkins wrote: Of course I got that. It was the "infinitely self-sufficient environment of infinite layers of infinite media" stuff that wasn't doing it for me. That would be neither my problem nor yours. - This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe

Re: [singularity] Re: Intuitive limits of applied CogPsy

2006-09-22 Thread Samantha Atkins
Of course I got that. It was the "infinitely self-sufficient environment of infinite layers of infinite media" stuff that wasn't doing it for me. - samantha On Sep 22, 2006, at 2:08 PM, Michael Anissimov wrote: On 9/22/06, Samantha Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This does not parse. Pl

Re: [singularity] Re: Intuitive limits of applied CogPsy

2006-09-22 Thread Michael Anissimov
Also relevant to this thread: http://www.singinst.org/CFAI/info/glossary.html#gloss_mirror -- Michael Anissimov Lifeboat Foundation http://lifeboat.com http://acceleratingfuture.com/michael/blog - This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your

Re: [singularity] Re: Intuitive limits of applied CogPsy

2006-09-22 Thread Michael Anissimov
On 9/22/06, Samantha Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This does not parse. Please rephrase. I think that Nathan is saying that we can learn how to better manipulate ourselves and others through the application of cognitive psychology, rather than just passively observing human nature, which i

Re: [singularity] Re: Intuitive limits of applied CogPsy

2006-09-22 Thread Samantha Atkins
This does not parse. Please rephrase. - s On Sep 19, 2006, at 5:57 PM, Nathan Barna wrote: Update to first description: The ultimate aim of applied cognitive psychology is for one to be an infinitely self-sufficient environment of infinite layers of infinite media where from any non-empty se