Ben wrote:
That doesn't mean they couldn't have some smart staff who shifted
research interest to AGI after moving to Google, but it doesn't seem
tremendously likely.
I don't agree. Google is a form of research engine that enables
information in grose load. How you "decyfer" it, is up to the
in
-- Forwarded message --
From: Joel Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 19, 2007 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: [singularity] Poll = AGI Motivation / Life Extension?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Bruce,
I believe life is all about seeking experience.
So my belief is that the singularity a) enab
I saw a talk about a year or two ago where one of the Google founders was
asked if they had projects to build general purpose artificial intelligence.
He answered that they did not have such a project at the company level,
however they did have many AI people in the company, some of whom where
int
For this AGI Poll, you can reply to this list or back to me
privately/directly (bruce -at- novamente.net). If you reply to me,
please let me know what info. I can use when replying back to the list
as I will create a summary of the AGI Poll results.
Thanks,
Bruce
Bruce Klein wrote:
In June 2
Joshua Fox wrote:
Any comments on this: http://news.com.com/2100-11395_3-6160372.html
Google has been mentioned in the context of AGI, simply because they
have money, parallel processing power, excellent people, an
orientation towards technological innovation, and important narrow AI
success
Any comments on this: http://news.com.com/2100-11395_3-6160372.html
Google has been mentioned in the context of AGI, simply because they have
money, parallel processing power, excellent people, an orientation towards
technological innovation, and important narrow AI successes and research
goals.
