Thanks for the link Tom. Makes me think of Lyndon LaRouche but perhaps that's
not a good analogy.
Eric B. Ramsay
Thomas McCabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 2, 2008 3:49 PM, Eric B. Ramsay wrote:
> I noticed that the members of the list have completely ignored this
> pronouncement by A.T.
On Feb 2, 2008 3:49 PM, Eric B. Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed that the members of the list have completely ignored this
> pronouncement by A.T. Murray. Is there a reason for this (for example is
> this person considered fringe or worse)?
>
> Eric B. Ramsay
>
>
http://en.nothingisre
Eric B. Ramsay wrote:
I noticed that the members of the list have completely ignored this
pronouncement by A.T. Murray. Is there a reason for this (for example is
this person considered fringe or worse)?
Being as generous as I can to Arthur (as I did recently on the AGI list)
his pronouncemen
On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:49 PM, Eric B. Ramsay wrote:
I noticed that the members of the list have completely ignored this
pronouncement by A.T. Murray. Is there a reason for this (for
example is this person considered fringe or worse)?
Bingo.
J. Andrew Rogers
-
This list is sponsored by
I noticed that the members of the list have completely ignored this
pronouncement by A.T. Murray. Is there a reason for this (for example is this
person considered fringe or worse)?
Eric B. Ramsay
"A. T. Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MindForth free open AI source code on-line at
ht
On Saturday 02 February 2008, Samantha Atkins wrote:
> I am not angry. I am bored with what seems like endless often off
> subject prattling going nowhere.
Then go build something?
- Bryan
Bryan Bishop
http://heybryan.org/
-
This list is sponsored
On Feb 2, 2008, at 7:29 AM, gifting wrote:
WTF (I can only assume what that stands for) are you such an angry
person. Or is linear thinking the only possible solution for your
VotW (guess what that stands for)?
I am not angry. I am bored with what seems like endless often off
subject
On Jan 27, 2008, at 5:40 AM, Mike Tintner wrote:
Ben: MT: Venter has changed everything
today - including the paradigms that govern both science and AI..
Ben: Lets not overblow things -- please note that Venter's team has
not yet
synthesized an artificial organism.
Here's why I think V
Hi,
Just a contextualizing note: this is the Singularity list not the AGI list so
the scope of appropriate discussion is not so restricted.
In my view, whacky models of the universe are at least moderately
relevant to Singularity. After the Singularity, we are almost sure to discover
that our cu
WTF (I can only assume what that stands for) are you such an angry
person. Or is linear thinking the only possible solution for your VotW
(guess what that stands for)?
Never heard of rhizome (theory). Sometimes stupid monkey things for
stupid monkeys like all of us and you are not that ba
WTF does this have to do with AGI or Singularity? I hope the AGI
gets here soon. We Stupid Monkeys get damn tiresome.
- samantha
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:06 AM, gifting wrote:
On 29 Jan 2008, at 14:13, Vladimir Nesov wrote:
On Jan 29, 2008 11:49 AM, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008, at 6:43 AM, Mike Tintner wrote:
Stathis: Are you simply arguing that an embodied AI that can
interact with the
real world will find it easier to learn and develop, or are you
arguing that there is a fundamental reason why an AI can't develop in
a purely virtual environment
12 matches
Mail list logo
