Re: [singularity] Replicable Patterns of Breakthroughs

2007-05-22 Thread Samantha Atkins
It might be more immediately accelerating to take a somewhat different tack. In many fields there is research in the labs that is missing some number of key components, sometimes breakthroughs, in the same field or others before it can go to next level or be turned into more broadly access

Re: [singularity] Replicable Patterns of Breakthroughs

2007-05-22 Thread Bruce Bautista
Hello Mark, I too have contemplated the idea you are interested in. I believe it is a sound approach to accelerating the knowledge in many fields. I do not know of any programs that have been done or are in progress along these lines. The power of having such a 'knowledge base' at anyone's dispos

Fwd: [singularity] Replicable Patterns of Breakthroughs

2007-05-22 Thread Joshua Fox
For all it's worth, the development of the atomic bomb is an often-made comparison http://www.mail-archive.com/singularity@v2.listbox.com/msg00585.html , as is the invention of powered heavier-than-air flight. Historiographers of science have various theories, among them Kuhn's idea of 'paradig

Re: [singularity] Replicable Patterns of Breakthroughs

2007-05-21 Thread Joshua Fox
For all it's worth, the development of the atomic bomb is an often-made comparison http://www.mail-archive.com/singularity@v2.listbox.com/msg00585.html , as is the invention of powered heavier-than-air flight. I posted on it here. Historiographers of science have various theories, among them Kuh

Re: [singularity] Replicable Patterns of Breakthroughs

2007-05-20 Thread Matt Mahoney
--- "Mark H. Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ---We can observe some general patterns. > ---1. Many great discoveries were made by accident. (If the > results were expected, it wouldn't be great). > > Reply: Perhaps this would justify allocating time to random > trial and error (of course no

Re: [singularity] Replicable Patterns of Breakthroughs

2007-05-19 Thread Mark H. Herman
[Replies enclosed] ---What fields would you consider analogous to AI? Reply: I do not have the technical knowledge to answer that directly, however, the source of relevant analogies might so broad as to include almost every field (e.g. I wouldn’t be surprised if "thesis, antithesis, and synthe

Re: [singularity] Replicable Patterns of Breakthroughs

2007-05-19 Thread Matt Mahoney
--- "Mark H. Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I imagine the following may have already been considered, > nevertheless: It would seem constructive to undertake an > analysis of breakthroughs in various fields (e.g. engineering, > art, chemistry) to search for patterns that might be > repl

[singularity] Replicable Patterns of Breakthroughs

2007-05-18 Thread Mark H. Herman
I imagine the following may have already been considered, nevertheless: It would seem constructive to undertake an analysis of breakthroughs in various fields (e.g. engineering, art, chemistry) to search for patterns that might be replicable. A general example of what I mean by a "pattern" wou