Hi,
Can a pres Uri have port information?
i.e. whether the following pres Uri is correct?
pres:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:12345
Thanks and Regards,
Vijay K S
DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for
the use of
the individual to whom it is
Hi
I've seen that my VoIP client X-Lite is sending NOTIFY request to publish
changes in its availability. I was expecting to see PUBLISH request instead
of NOTIFY ...
Is it so that one could use NOTIFY instead of PUBLISH request ?
I'm curious to know where this is defined in standard. Please
El Tuesday 01 April 2008 13:55:21 Pascal Maugeri escribió:
Very interesting this peer-to-peer presence mode ! I did not see this
configuration option.
Of course all clients should be in the same mode I guess ?
Right.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Very interesting this peer-to-peer presence mode ! I did not see this
configuration option.
Of course all clients should be in the same mode I guess ?
Gracias Iñaki
-pascal
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El Tuesday 01 April 2008 13:09:17 Pascal
El Tuesday 01 April 2008 15:02:26 Robert Sparks escribió:
3261 says you SHOULD include the Content-Length on UDP. That's only
not a MUST because
there was some deployed 2543 stuff at the time that 3261 went out.
I haven't read anywhere that it SHOULD include Content-Length in UDP request:
6231
I've been following this discussion for a bit. I agree that the grammar is
probably overly permissive but it is what it is. Just for fun, I decided to
contribute a bit here. In my implementation, I run the following little
preprocessor bit over all incoming messages. The idea is to try to
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Frank W. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been following this discussion for a bit. I agree that the grammar is
probably overly permissive but it is what it is. Just for fun, I decided to
contribute a bit here. In my implementation, I run the
In RFC 3261, section 12.2.1.1 it gives example of strict routing. It
explains that uac has route set:
sip:proxy1, sip:proxy2,
sip:proxy3;lr,sip:proxy4,sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since uac see the proxy1 is strict route it create the following
request:
METHOD sip:proxy1
Route: sip:proxy2,
Right now when I run it, its run over the entire message, there's no check
for a body. The only bodies I deal with currently are SDP and PIDF. The
former is line oriented and the latter is XML so I suppose it hasn't been an
issue to date.
Good point on the quoted strings. Funny I've never
Frank W. Miller wrote:
Right now when I run it, its run over the entire message, there's no check
for a body. The only bodies I deal with currently are SDP and PIDF. The
former is line oriented and the latter is XML so I suppose it hasn't been an
issue to date.
Good point on the
You can't really just check for quotes out of context. In some contexts
they might not always come in pairs.
FM: Where does the syntax allow for unpaired quotes? I did a quick search
on 3261 for DQUOT and didn't see any place where they are allowed to be
unmatched. Forgive my ignorance?
Mohammed,
Strict Router is the one that follows route processing rules as
described in RFC 2543. And with reference to your question below,
The route set at UAC consists of
sip:proxy1,sip:proxy2,sip:proxy3;lr,sip:proxy4;lr
As the first entry in the route set does not contain the lr
Frank W. Miller wrote:
You can't really just check for quotes out of context. In some contexts
they might not always come in pairs.
FM: Where does the syntax allow for unpaired quotes? I did a quick search
on 3261 for DQUOT and didn't see any place where they are allowed to be
-Original Message-
From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 3:35 PM
To: Frank W. Miller
Cc: 'Iñaki Baz Castillo'; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Why SIP abnf is so permissive???
Frank W. Miller wrote:
You
Frank W. Miller wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 3:35 PM
To: Frank W. Miller
Cc: 'Iñaki Baz Castillo'; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Why SIP abnf is so permissive???
Well, my parser works as follows:
1) Collapse white space and more importantly, continuation lines
2) Load the message into a line oriented data structure that allows for
quick searching of the headers
3) On-demand parse the headers as they are needed by higher level UA
functions
I do not
16 matches
Mail list logo
