Dale Worley wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 13:43 -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>> Putting port number 0 into m-line should be just enough. Port number of
>> 0 means that the stream has been rejected. Any sensible [UAS] should send
>> a BYE upon receipt of such SDP answer immediately.
>
> And by "a
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 13:43 -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Putting port number 0 into m-line should be just enough. Port number of
> 0 means that the stream has been rejected. Any sensible [UAS] should send
> a BYE upon receipt of such SDP answer immediately.
And by "any sensible UAC should..." w
Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>
>
> Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>> Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>>>
>>> Dale Worley wrote:
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 13:32 +0530, Nabam Serbang wrote:
> 1) If the offer being presented in 2xx (200 OK) for INVITE is not
> acceptable
> by UAC, what would be the valid answer in t
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>>
>> Dale Worley wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 13:32 +0530, Nabam Serbang wrote:
1) If the offer being presented in 2xx (200 OK) for INVITE is not
acceptable
by UAC, what would be the valid answer in that ACK? Remember this not
r
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> 0 means that the stream has been rejected. Any sensible UAC should send
^^^
"UAS" in this case.
Regards,
--
Maksym Sobolyev
Sippy Software, Inc.
Internet Telephony (VoIP) Experts
T/F: +1-646-651-1110
Web: http://w
Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>
> Dale Worley wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 13:32 +0530, Nabam Serbang wrote:
>>> 1) If the offer being presented in 2xx (200 OK) for INVITE is not acceptable
>>> by UAC, what would be the valid answer in that ACK? Remember this not
>>> re-INVITE which will have prior SDP.
Dale Worley wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 13:32 +0530, Nabam Serbang wrote:
>> 1) If the offer being presented in 2xx (200 OK) for INVITE is not acceptable
>> by UAC, what would be the valid answer in that ACK? Remember this not
>> re-INVITE which will have prior SDP.
>
> No doubt you can take
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 13:32 +0530, Nabam Serbang wrote:
> 1) If the offer being presented in 2xx (200 OK) for INVITE is not acceptable
> by UAC, what would be the valid answer in that ACK? Remember this not
> re-INVITE which will have prior SDP.
No doubt you can take the SDP in the 200, modify in
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nabam Serbang
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 2:03 AM
> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Offer in 2xx of INVITE
>
> Hi All,
>
> Section 13.2.2.4 of rfc 3261 says that
> " If the offer in t
Hi All,
Section 13.2.2.4 of rfc 3261 says that
" If the offer in the 2xx response is not acceptable, the UAC core MUST
generate a valid answer in the ACK and then send a BYE immediately"
I have some question on this behavior:
1) If the offer being presented in 2xx (200 OK) for INVITE is not acce
There is no reason why the storage backend of a locator service has to
be LDAP.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Out Bound Proxy is the one whose IP will be configured in your SIP client and
> every request from client will go through this proxy.
> Register/Registrar server are same ,will re
Hi,
Out Bound Proxy is the one whose IP will be configured in your SIP client and
every request from client will go through this proxy.
Register/Registrar server are same ,will receive the register request and
maintain the user information in database(ldap)
Hope this helps
-Original Messa
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 1:33 PM, chandan kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> Could any one let me know whats is the difference between outbound proxy
> ,registrar server & register server.
Please, read RFC3261.
Outbound Proxy: A proxy that receives requests from a client, even
though it
Hi ,
Could any one let me know whats is the difference between outbound proxy
,registrar server & register server.
cheers
chandan.
Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to
http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/
___
Sip-implementors
14 matches
Mail list logo
