Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Stacks

2009-05-21 Thread cool goose
Well I agree that its not an easy task but its achievable. If you are spending a good quality time in understanding open source SIP stacks and writing applications on top of it, you may as well try to figure out how it is designed and developed in that process. At the worst if I may not end up dev

Re: [Sip-implementors] 5XX or 4XX ?

2009-05-21 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
El Jueves, 21 de Mayo de 2009, Ashwath Kumar escribió: > HI, > My Gateway is receiving the following two INVITEs > > *FIRST INVITE: * > INVITE sip:2...@10.77.15.12:5060 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 171.71.167.69:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-12815-1-0 > From: sipp ;tag=12815SIPpTag001 > To: sut > Call-ID: 1-

[Sip-implementors] 5XX or 4XX ?

2009-05-21 Thread Ashwath Kumar
HI, My Gateway is receiving the following two INVITEs *FIRST INVITE: * INVITE sip:2...@10.77.15.12:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 171.71.167.69:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-12815-1-0 From: sipp ;tag=12815SIPpTag001 To: sut Call-ID: 1-12...@171.71.167.69 CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: Max-Forwards: 70 Subject: P

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTER without expiration of previous REGISTER

2009-05-21 Thread Brett Tate
> When the UAC comes up , if it sends a REGISTER, with a new > Call-Id (Other fields are the same as before: Address-of-record, > Contact-ID, To, From, non zero expiration etc). My interpretation > is that in this case if the Call-Id is different, the CSeq would > not be checked. Is that correc

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP REGISTER without expiration of previousREGISTER

2009-05-21 Thread Arunachalam Venkatraman (arunvenk)
My point was that if you accepted the first registration without authentication, then all bets are off. Any UAC can register the AOR. I was suggesting that the issue of authenticating the first registration is just as important. If you solved that problem, the subsequent registration will also be a

Re: [Sip-implementors] REGISTER without Contact

2009-05-21 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2009/5/21 friend friend : > In RFC 3665 : >    Bob sends a register request to the Proxy Server containing no >    Contact headers, indicating the user wishes to query the server for >    the user's current contact list.  Since the user already has >    authenticated with the server, the user s

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Stacks

2009-05-21 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Paul Kyzivat wrote: > > cool goose wrote: >> Thanks All for pointing me towards some resources. I have never written any >> protocol stacks before except for few small SIP tools. This would be my >> first time writing a SIP stack and that's where I felt a need for some >> literature or books on de

Re: [Sip-implementors] REGISTER without Contact

2009-05-21 Thread Shanbhag, Somesh (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
Comments inline with [SSS] -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of ext Vikas Jayaprakash Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 12:38 PM To: friend friend Cc: sip fourm Subject: Re: [Sip-implemen

Re: [Sip-implementors] REGISTER without Contact

2009-05-21 Thread Vikas Jayaprakash
Hi, Scenario 1: === If a Register request is coming without credentials for the first time(with/without Contact Header), then registrar will authenticate the UAC. (RFC 3261 Page 63, Point3) Scenario 2: === Once a user is Registered, and within that registration expiry interval If