[Sip-implementors] [gruu] Registrar changes the Public GRUU for a refresh - REGISTER

2009-12-01 Thread hanifa.mohammed
Hi all, an excerpt from RFC 5627 "However, a UA MUST be prepared for the public GRUU to change from a previous one, since the persistence property is not guaranteed with complete certainty." So, even for a refresh-REGISTER, the public GRUU may be different. In that case, for all existing s

Re: [Sip-implementors] Any real case of a TEL/SIP URI with parameters as user?

2009-12-01 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
El Martes, 1 de Diciembre de 2009, Paul Kyzivat escribió: > > Yes, but that makes sense when setting the URI as Request URI and so, but > > I just mean the URI with identifies a user, this is, the same URI that > > the user sets in "From" header or credentials "username" field. > > The cases wher

Re: [Sip-implementors] Any real case of a TEL/SIP URI with parameters as user?

2009-12-01 Thread Paul Kyzivat
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > El Martes, 1 de Diciembre de 2009, Paul Kyzivat escribió: > >>> So, is there any SIP core in which such URI's exist for its users? >>> Of course "they COULD exist", however I want to know if they *really* >>> exist :) >> I'm curious why you ask. >> >> Are you consider

[Sip-implementors] First CfP: IPTComm 2010: 4th Conference on Principles, Systems and Applications of IP Telecommunications

2009-12-01 Thread Vijay K. Gurbani
Dear Colleagues: IPTComm is one of the few conferences dedicated solely to IP telecommunications. Please excuse the posting to this list, but I believe that the conference may be of interest to many of the list participants. IPTCOMM 2010 The Fourth Conference on Principles, Systems

Re: [Sip-implementors] Any real case of a TEL/SIP URI with parameters as user?

2009-12-01 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
El Martes, 1 de Diciembre de 2009, Paul Kyzivat escribió: > > So, is there any SIP core in which such URI's exist for its users? > > Of course "they COULD exist", however I want to know if they *really* > > exist :) > > I'm curious why you ask. > > Are you considering an implementation that cann

Re: [Sip-implementors] Any real case of a TEL/SIP URI with parameters as user?

2009-12-01 Thread Paul Kyzivat
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > Hi, if there any *real* case in any SIP core (i.e: IMS) in which a user could > have a URI with parameters? > > Usually it doesn't occur as any network/provider users have an identifier > like: > - sip:al...@domain.org > - tel:+12345678 > > However I wonder if

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query related to OPTIONS

2009-12-01 Thread Paul Kyzivat
sunil.bha...@wipro.com wrote: > Hi, > > Say, UAS doesn't have any endpoint configured and will not be able to handle > calls. In this case, should the UAS send a 4xx response, say 408 timeout, > when it receives OPTIONS request, or is it better to ignore the incoming > OPTIONS request and not

[Sip-implementors] Any real case of a TEL/SIP URI with parameters as user?

2009-12-01 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
Hi, if there any *real* case in any SIP core (i.e: IMS) in which a user could have a URI with parameters? Usually it doesn't occur as any network/provider users have an identifier like: - sip:al...@domain.org - tel:+12345678 However I wonder if there is a real case in which users have param

Re: [Sip-implementors] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

2009-12-01 Thread Alex Balashov
Fail. Mayank Gupta wrote: > LinkedIn > > > > > > I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. > > - Mayank > > Confirm that you know Mayank Gupta > https://www.linkedin.com/e/isd/896104031/eCIMZorP/ > > Every day, millions of professionals like Mayank Gupta u

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query related to OPTIONS

2009-12-01 Thread sunil.bhagat
Hi, Say, UAS doesn't have any endpoint configured and will not be able to handle calls. In this case, should the UAS send a 4xx response, say 408 timeout, when it receives OPTIONS request, or is it better to ignore the incoming OPTIONS request and not send any response to it? Regards, Sunil -