From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Vivek Batra
[vivek.ba...@matrixcomsec.com]
1. Is it best practice not to include the SIP Port in Request-URI, To
and From field (of REG
Hi friends,
Please suggest on following issues related to DNS SRV;
1. Is it best practice not to include the SIP Port in Request-URI, To
and From field (of REGISTER, INVITE etc) when SIP domain port is resolved
using DNS SRV query?
Is there any harm if we don't include the SIP port
Thank you guys, that was exactly the problem.
Simon.
___
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
Few basic issues which I can quickly see is that if this REFER is an in-dialog
REFER, then it has to be on a separate transaction and if you see the top via
branch and CSeq number it is still referring to the ACK transaction. Fix it and
see
Remember each REQUEST and it's corresponding RESPONSE
Hi
Try having REFER Cseq as "104".
Thanks
Gagandeep Bajaj
-Original Message-
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of
SCG2
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 7:16 PM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
S
Hi,
I have a (what is probably simple) problem with trying to drive a REFER to a
phone that is in a call successfully:
192.168.1.8 = IP address of o/b proxy
192.168.1.109 = IP address of Phone A - making the call - a SPA941
192.168.1.108 = IP address of Phone B - receiving
Hi friends,
Please suggest on following issues related to DNS SRV;
Is it best practice not to include the SIP Port in Request-URI, To and From
field (of REGISTER, INVITE etc) when SIP domain port is resolved using DNS SRV
query?
Is there any harm if we don't include the SIP port in
