> 1) Should the Register renewal have the empty nonce. I think it should have
> the same nonce as the INVITE.
2) Should the call be dropped after 401 for the registration renewal? I am
> thinking since the Register renewal did eventually got the 200OK, may be MTA
> should have kept the call alive.
Adding to what Dale said:
Even in 3gpp, a registration failure should not cause a deregistration.
Rather, state should be the same as if you hadn't done it at all.
So as long as you eventually get it right before the registration
succeeds you should not have a problem.
Of course, if you waited
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Vivek Singla
[vivsin...@yahoo.com]
1) Should the Register renewal have the empty nonce. I think it should have the
same nonce as the INVITE
Hi,
I have a scenario here in the lab. I was wondering if I could ask couple of
questions.
MTA P-CSCF
Register (Empty nonce) >
<401 (with nonce)
Register (nonce)>
<--
I have seen your question in several different forums. The right place
for this question is us...@jain-sip.dev.java.net.
The method in question is deprecated. I am going to be changing that
to throw exception and not return null pointer.
You will need to store the Dialog, transaction association
Hi ,
After searching alot in google, I am not able to solve 1 problem and I
got a post of 2008 in which I found your email id.So, I am sending you this
mail, in hope that you can help me.
I am trying to achieve the HOLD functionality. I am using JAIN SIP
API. I got so many theory on ho
