13 jan 2011 kl. 23.36 skrev Paul Kyzivat:
>
>
> On 1/13/2011 10:38 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>> 2011/1/13 Olle E. Johansson:
>>> - Does your UA add an SDP to a 488 error message?
>>
>> Most probably no UA in the world adds SDP to a 488 response.
>
> I don't know, but I suspect you are rig
On 1/13/2011 10:38 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2011/1/13 Olle E. Johansson:
>> - Does your UA add an SDP to a 488 error message?
>
> Most probably no UA in the world adds SDP to a 488 response.
I don't know, but I suspect you are right, or nearly so.
> And for sure, no UA in the galaxy woul
2011/1/13 Olle E. Johansson :
> - Does your UA add an SDP to a 488 error message?
Most probably no UA in the world adds SDP to a 488 response.
And for sure, no UA in the galaxy would inspect/interpret a SDP in a
488 response, at least not within next 20 years.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
__
On 01/13/2011 08:57 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>
> 13 jan 2011 kl. 15.36 skrev Paul Kyzivat:
>
>> Also, the following from the description of 488:
>>
>>A message body containing a description of media capabilities MAY be
>>present in the response, which is formatted according to the Accep
Sunil,
Its not clear to me if you have a question for sip-implementors, or a
question for IMS-implementors.
The reg event package provides a way to monitor the status of *all* the
registrations for a particular AoR. The fact that a UA has unregistered
itself (or been unregistered) does not mea
13 jan 2011 kl. 15.36 skrev Paul Kyzivat:
> Also, the following from the description of 488:
>
> A message body containing a description of media capabilities MAY be
> present in the response, which is formatted according to the Accept
> header field in the INVITE (or application/sdp if no
Also, the following from the description of 488:
A message body containing a description of media capabilities MAY be
present in the response, which is formatted according to the Accept
header field in the INVITE (or application/sdp if not present), the
same as a message body in a
Hi All,
According to the 3GPP 24.229 spec,
Upon successful de-registration UA should not delete the dialog for
Subscription to reg event package if it had subscribed.
Exerts from 24.229:
-
2011/1/13 Olle E. Johansson :
> I don't like the idea of sending 200 OK to failed requests though, it kind of
> breaks my vulcan logic circuit.
Yes, it's a bit exotic but the UAC is supposed to inspect the Contact
URI's of the 200 for a REGISTER to realize of the registered
locations:
The 2xx
13 jan 2011 kl. 10.02 skrev Iñaki Baz Castillo:
> 2011/1/13 Olle E. Johansson :
>> YOu're talking about "reject the request" - how do we reject the request
>> based on policy after a successful authentication?
>
> REGISTER ->
> <- 401
> REGISTER -> (correct credentials)
> <
2011/1/13 Olle E. Johansson :
> YOu're talking about "reject the request" - how do we reject the request
> based on policy after a successful authentication?
REGISTER ->
<- 401
REGISTER -> (correct credentials)
<- 403
What is wrong sending such 403 after successful authent
11 matches
Mail list logo
