Re: [Sip-implementors] Call Hold Resume issue , inactive answer after sendonly

2014-05-12 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 5/12/14 10:16 AM, Brett Tate wrote: Hi, I assume that Paul intended to indicate RFC6337. Thanks Brett. Yes, 6337. Thanks, Paul -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip- implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behal

Re: [Sip-implementors] Call Hold Resume issue , inactive answer after sendonly

2014-05-12 Thread Brett Tate
Hi, I assume that Paul intended to indicate RFC6337. > -Original Message- > From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip- > implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Sander Rambags > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 4:54 AM > To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.colu

Re: [Sip-implementors] Call Hold Resume issue , inactive answer after sendonly

2014-05-12 Thread Sander Rambags
RFC6637 ??? I don't think that's the one you mean. Rg Sander ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors