Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header

2014-07-02 Thread swaminathan.seetharaman
Hi All, Yes, it is not usual to receive a PAI with Anonymous URI. The PAI would typically not be included instead. However, a From header can contain an "anonymous" or "unavailable" user identity. Pl. refer to 3GPP TS 23.003 (Section 13.6 in v8.17.0) as well as 3GPP TS 29.163 (Table 3/Table 12

[Sip-implementors] Reminder : Details for SIPit 31

2014-07-02 Thread Robert Sparks
Please note again that the hotel block rates require reservation before the end of this month. If you plan to attend the event, but haven't registered, please do so soon. Thanks, RjS On 4/28/14, 2:23 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: On 3/20/14, 12:42 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: SIPit 31 will be held i

Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header

2014-07-02 Thread Paul Kyzivat
Is is silly and inappropriate to assert the validity of anonymous@anonymous.invalid, because there is no such domain. Hence nobody is in a position to make such an assertion. But it could be appropriate to assert sip:anonymous@somedomain. This would presumably mean: this is from *some* valid u

Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header

2014-07-02 Thread Brett Tate
> May i know whether it is valid to add > Anonymous URI (anonymous@anonymous.invalid) > in the PAI (P-Asserted-Identity) header filed. It likely depends upon what you mean by valid. Since anonymous@anonymous.invalid isn't a real identity (i.e. "invalid" reserved for special meaning), my understan

Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header

2014-07-02 Thread Joel Gerber
RFC 3325/3324. I don't think this scenario is directly mentioned, because it's silly, but it's valid according to the ABNF. Joel Gerber Network Specialist Network Operations Eastlink E: joel.ger...@corp.eastlink.ca T: 519.786.1241 -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.c

Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header

2014-07-02 Thread Rajesh
Thanks Abhishek. Could you please send me any references on this from RFCs and i would really appreciate if you can mention any scenario where we can see PAI header with anonymous URI Regards Rajesh On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:18 PM, abhishek verma wrote: > It is valid > > > On Wednesday, 2 July

Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header

2014-07-02 Thread Joel Gerber
It's valid, but more than slightly silly. Why even send a PAID if it's not going to have valid information? For PPID, it still would be valid, but pretty much guaranteed that it will be ignored. Joel Gerber Network Specialist Network Operations Eastlink E: joel.ger...@corp.eastlink.ca T: 519.78

[Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header

2014-07-02 Thread Rajesh
Hi, May i know whether it is valid to add Anonymous URI ( anonymous@anonymous.invalid) in the PAI (P-Asserted-Identity) header filed. Thanks Regards Rajesh ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.colum