Re: [Sip-implementors] Ack new transaction as per 3261 but what now after rfc6026

2014-11-03 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 11/3/14 7:59 PM, ankur bansal wrote: Thanks Paul for the answer But still not clear why ACK needs to be new transaction .Anyway TU only sending ACK so multiple ACKs can be sent if multiple 200 come. Do we have any better explanation for this .Also i was thinking if they changed the 200 transac

Re: [Sip-implementors] Ack new transaction as per 3261 but what now after rfc6026

2014-11-03 Thread ankur bansal
Thanks Paul for the answer But still not clear why ACK needs to be new transaction .Anyway TU only sending ACK so multiple ACKs can be sent if multiple 200 come. Do we have any better explanation for this .Also i was thinking if they changed the 200 transaction handling from transaction terminate t