Re: [Sip-implementors] ReINVITE offer answer failure

2014-12-04 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 12/4/14 2:20 AM, Tarun2 Gupta wrote: Hi Our implementation is clearing the call on receiving no SDP (answer) in 200 OK for a ReINVITE with SDP (offer) sent. Is this (call clearing) the recommended behavior? I am not able to find any normative RFC references to support this. Can you please

Re: [Sip-implementors] ReINVITE offer answer failure

2014-12-04 Thread Vivek Batra
Alok/Srinivas, Agree Best Regards, Vivek Batra On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Alok Tiwari wrote: > Hi Vivek, > > Here the issue is media is not in sync. If UAS is not providing the SDP in > answer, how UAC can ensure whether the ongoing media is reliable anymore > and if the session is not r

Re: [Sip-implementors] ReINVITE offer answer failure

2014-12-04 Thread Alok Tiwari
Hi Vivek, Here the issue is media is not in sync. If UAS is not providing the SDP in answer, how UAC can ensure whether the ongoing media is reliable anymore and if the session is not reliable, it should not be continued. Thanks, Alok Tiwari On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Banda, Srinivas (Srin

Re: [Sip-implementors] ReINVITE offer answer failure

2014-12-04 Thread Tarun2 Gupta
Hi I tend to agree with Alok and Srinivas, I would not have cleared the dialog if it was any other failure like a 488 response. However, here the UAS has not sent any SDP in 200 OK. Still trying to find definitive references in RFCs. Regards Tarun Gupta -Original Message- From: sip-imp

Re: [Sip-implementors] ReINVITE offer answer failure

2014-12-04 Thread Banda, Srinivas (Srinivas)
Hi Vivek, RFC 3264 says, if Re-INVITE fails (Ex : 4xx or 5xx any other error) UAC should switch back to the state which has before sending the Re-INVITE. Here Re-INVITE is not failing, it has 200 OK but no media. So UAC has no other option so terminating the call with BYE. Regards Srinivas --

Re: [Sip-implementors] ReINVITE offer answer failure

2014-12-04 Thread Vivek Batra
Hi all, Just thinking widely if it's violating the SDP offer/answer in ReINVITE, then why to terminate the complete dialog instead of clearing only specific transaction... Best Regards, Vivek Batra On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Alok Tiwari wrote: > Hi Tarun, > > IMO, this behavior is correc

Re: [Sip-implementors] ReINVITE offer answer failure

2014-12-04 Thread Alok Tiwari
Hi Tarun, IMO, this behavior is correct as it violates the offer-answer model. The answer must have overlapped SDP. But in mentioned scenario, the media at UAC and UAS is not in sync and therefore UAC should terminate the dialog in such scenario. Thanks, Alok Tiwari On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:50