Re: [Sip-implementors] Does Min-Expires in 423 Interval too brief has precedence over 200OK Contact expires?

Juan De Stefano writes: > I have a situation where an SBC is handling non symmetric signalling on > REGISTER process. > (1) The UAC sends REGISTER with Expires=600 to SBC and then SBC sends it to > real Registrar. > (2) The Real Registrar rejects the REGISTER with a 423 Interval too brief > and se

Re: [Sip-implementors] Does Min-Expires in 423 Interval too brief has precedence over 200OK Contact expires?

On 1/22/15 5:54 AM, Brett Tate wrote: What value the UAC should use in Expires header on the next REGISTER refresh? It can basically use whatever it wants. However if it wants to avoid potentially receiving another 423, using a value >= last Min-Expires would be best. I pragmatically agree w

Re: [Sip-implementors] Does Min-Expires in 423 Interval too brief has precedence over 200OK Contact expires?

> What value the UAC should use in Expires header > on the next REGISTER refresh? It can basically use whatever it wants. However if it wants to avoid potentially receiving another 423, using a value >= last Min-Expires would be best. -- Meet with us at Mobile World Congress 2015