Hi ,
if contact header is optional in REGISTER request then, multiple TO header
can be sent to register multiple contact ?
As per my knowledge, To header should not be multiple then why it has been said
in RFC 3261 that contact header is optional in Register.
Tha
Hi Dale,
Thanks for your response.
1) You meant to say that Registration is creating a dialog (dialog-id) but
there is no reason for using it. Am I correct ?
2) No more thing is here, can u explain me the logical reason behind "The
Contact header field MUST contain exactly one SIP
o
"Karthik.v" writes:
> 1) Please state a real time scenario where multiple contact headers will be
> present in a REGISTER request ?
The most likely use is when a UA knows only its IP address and not any
DNS name for that address. Then if it wants to register both an IPv4
address and an IPv6 addr
On 12/30/15 5:17 AM, Vivek Batra wrote:
3. Since it is optional and not sent in the REGISTER request, I would like
to see registrar to simply return the present bindings. However not
surprise for me if it's been rejected with 400 Bad Request and can be seen
in many practical implementations.
I
On 12/30/15 1:32 AM, Karthik.v wrote:
Hi all,
I have some list of queries on sip ,
It sounds like you are just getting started with sip. If you haven't
already, you would do well to read one or more of the introductory books.
1) Please state a real time scenario where multiple co
Hi,
1. Please note that SIP is not limited to telephony application. For
instance, user tries to register SIP address, mail address and phone number
as a contact address in one REGISTER message. In addition, it can not be
used to register multiple devices, only multiple identities of one device.
