Re: [Sip-implementors] Different TO Tag in SIP Bye as compare to SIP 200 OK

2017-11-29 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 11/29/17 9:50 PM, NK wrote: Dear All, I have the problem where the customer is sending the BYE after 200 OK, but my switch refused to identify the dialog and sent the SIP 481, and I feel this is because of different TO tag. SIP 200 OK in the correspondence of initial Invite. *Switch to

[Sip-implementors] Different TO Tag in SIP Bye as compare to SIP 200 OK

2017-11-29 Thread NK
Dear All, I have the problem where the customer is sending the BYE after 200 OK, but my switch refused to identify the dialog and sent the SIP 481, and I feel this is because of different TO tag. SIP 200 OK in the correspondence of initial Invite. *Switch to UAC* From: ""

[Sip-implementors] presence state and/or blf

2017-11-29 Thread Rolando Sanchez Espada
Hello, I am investigating about the service "state of presence", where a phone(like polycom) can monitor the state of the a group of phone and interact with them, however I can not find a straightforward way to achieve that with kamailio? I found several docs with several ways to implement it and