Re: [Sip-implementors] 401 Unauthorized with Require Header?

2018-08-15 Thread Sreekanth
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 at 08:31, Dale R. Worley wrote: > Sreekanth writes: > > I am going through the SIP RFC (3261) and couldn't find anything > specified > > regarding the 401 Unauthorized challenge response from the UAS side > during > > a registration. > > > > I wanted to confirm whether it is

Re: [Sip-implementors] 401 Unauthorized with Require Header?

2018-08-15 Thread Dale R. Worley
Sreekanth writes: > I am going through the SIP RFC (3261) and couldn't find anything specified > regarding the 401 Unauthorized challenge response from the UAS side during > a registration. > > I wanted to confirm whether it is okay to add a *Require *header into this > 401 Unauthorized message

[Sip-implementors] 401 Unauthorized with Require Header?

2018-08-15 Thread Sreekanth
Hi All, I am going through the SIP RFC (3261) and couldn't find anything specified regarding the 401 Unauthorized challenge response from the UAS side during a registration. I wanted to confirm whether it is okay to add a *Require *header into this 401 Unauthorized message response. Regards