Re: [Sip-implementors] 400 BadRequest

2021-02-23 Thread Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB)
Thanks, I value your opinion very much ! BR/pj Sensitivity: Internal -Original Message- From: Paul Kyzivat Sent: den 23 februari 2021 20:05 To: Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB) ; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 400 BadRequest On 2/23/21

Re: [Sip-implementors] 400 BadRequest

2021-02-23 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 2/23/21 1:53 PM, Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB) wrote: Hi ! I had to hide some customer related info, but otherwise the request is now complete. (I don't know of any way to provide a wireshark trace without revealing customer information, I have not yet found a way to recreate the

Re: [Sip-implementors] 400 BadRequest

2021-02-23 Thread Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB)
Hi ! I had to hide some customer related info, but otherwise the request is now complete. (I don't know of any way to provide a wireshark trace without revealing customer information, I have not yet found a way to recreate the problem with my test equipment)

Re: [Sip-implementors] 400 BadRequest

2021-02-23 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 2/22/21 9:09 AM, Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB) wrote: Hi again ! Correction, there are of course not any "require: 100Rel" in INVITE, sorry I mixed things up ! BR/pj We have a vendor that is saying that they correctly answers initial INVITE with 400 BadRequest because the INVITE