Thank you !
Sensitivity: Internal
-Original Message-
From: Paul Kyzivat
Sent: den 7 september 2023 16:14
To: Roman Shpount ; Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB)
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Call hold with a=inactive
On 9/7/23 8:44 AM,
On 9/7/23 8:44 AM, Roman Shpount wrote:
No, A is not on hold. Placing on hold requires a user action. Unless the
user of A placed it on hold, A is not on hold. Anything done by B doesn't
affect A hold status.
+1
An offer should only be based on local preferences, because the other
side can
That sounds reasonable, thank you !
Sensitivity: Internal
From: Roman Shpount
Sent: den 7 september 2023 14:45
To: Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB)
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Call hold with a=inactive
No, A is not on hold. Placing on
No, A is not on hold. Placing on hold requires a user action. Unless the
user of A placed it on hold, A is not on hold. Anything done by B doesn't
affect A hold status.
_
Roman Shpount
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 8:38 AM Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB) <
But you could argue that also A is on hold after “3. A sends 200 ok with
a=inactive” ?
BR/pj
Sensitivity: Internal
From: Roman Shpount
Sent: den 7 september 2023 14:26
To: Sundbaum Per-Johan (Telenor Sverige AB)
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors]
A should respond with a=sendrecv. The A response (offer in 2XX response to
a re-INVITE) should depend on A hold status only. The state of B has no
effect on A offers. So, since A is not on hold, a=sendrecv is the most
appropriate answer.
On the other hand, if A sends a re-INVITE without SDP to B,
Hi !
A question that I hope is simple for some helpful person to answer:
1. Call connected between A and B
2. B holds the call with re-INVITE a=inactive
3. A sends 200 ok with a=inactive
4. B sends re-INVITE without SDP
A should answer a=sendonly or is a=sendrecv normally a better option or
