Many thanks for the pointers.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzi...@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:05 AM
To: Dushyant Godse
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] How to resolve 491 request pending cross
over on Re-INVITEs
HI
I am sure this has been asked many times but I could not find a
definitive thread on how to resolve this. Moreover RFC 3261 section 14.2
is vague about resolving race conditions for Re-INVITEs. You could
directly skip over to offending section (in red) below for the issue in
question.
Here
Hello,
I am trying to analyze deployment of a B2BUA NAT equipment to be
deployed as part of a solution. My SIP end point are deployed (as in
home agents) deployed behind a NAT/firewall and sends messages across
the B2BUA NAT device to SIP Servers/registrars located in the public
network. Are ther
Hello
Can SIP REGISTERED end points receive NOTIFY event messages from the
registrar? Is REGISTER treated like a SUBSCRIBE (subscription) message
here by the registrar? I am trying to locate exact RFC reference here or
is registrar behavior incorrect?
Thanks in advance
D
Hello
I was referencing the RFC 3515 regarding messaging for transfers based
on SIP REFER.
Is the UA processing the REFER required to send NOTIFY subscription
event messages to the sender agent notifying the progress of the
transfer like 100 trying, 180 ringing, 200 OK. Is this a MUST?
I am pastin
