[Sip-implementors] Multiple Colon (:) as Header delimiter of name-value

value or if two Colons(:) can occur sequentially delimiting Header name and value. If someone can point me to a Section of RFC, it will be very helpful. Thanks in advance, Gaurav Khare DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be l

[Sip-implementors] EVS Codec

reject the same if he deems so. Thanks, Gaurav Khare DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the

[Sip-implementors] Order of parameters in FROM header

response? INVITE Header>From: ;tag=127.0.0.1alUtKGp-05957+1+60760003+7615abee 180Ringing>From: ;tag=127.0.0.1alUtKGp-05957+1+60760003+7615abee Thanks, Gaurav Khare DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be l

[Sip-implementors] SDP boundary demarcation

Hi, Can anyone point me the RFC which clearly states whether a new line is mandatory/optional before/after every boundary line in SDP. For ex which of the below are valid: CASE 1: With new line INVITE sip:conf-f...@example.com SIP/2.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary="boundary

[Sip-implementors] Unknown parameter in Via/Record-Route

3AAAED1AB62B@1f70 CSeq: 1 INVITE Max-Forwards: 69 Record-Route: Contact: Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 184 ... Thanks, Gaurav Khare DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended

[Sip-implementors] Multiple telephone-event in "m" line

telephone-event payload should my SIP server select considering 1. I select AMR-NB (PT=96) 2. I Select AMR-WB (PT=98) Is there any dependency of clock frequency of telephone-event on the selected audio codec. Thanks, Gaurav Khare DISCLAIMER: The information in

Re: [Sip-implementors] Keep retransmitting 486 Busy...

The only issue I can see is in the formation of FROM header in ACK request. See if this header is exactly equal to that of INVITE. Everything else seems to be fine. Thanks Gaurav Khare - Original Message - From: "Vivek Batra" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 9:40 AM Sub

Re: [Sip-implementors] Canceling INVITE Transaction...

: For the first part, UAC must ensure not to send CANCEL before receiving provisional response from UAS. For the second part, UAC must ensure the header values to be same as described in above snippet. Thanks and Regards Gaurav Khare - Original Message - From: "Vivek Batra"

Re: [Sip-implementors] Route Set creation from response

Hi Puneet, 200 OK i.e. 5 will contain Contact header which contains target-uri for the UAS. While creating ACK, Request URI should be filled up with that target-uri so proxy will not face any problem in forwarding. - Original Message - From: "Kumar, Puneet (Puneet)" To: "Kamini Gangwani"