Re: [Sip-implementors] Question: Does 200 OK(INVITE) without SDP is valid response for INVITE with SDP offer?

2008-11-20 Thread NC Reddy
: No this isn't valid. The offer must be answered. This is the Session Initiation Protocol. Without an answer you have not initiated a session. Paul NC Reddy wrote: Hi, I have the following context question: UAC -AS(B2BUA) | --F1 (INVITE)--- * SDP

Re: [Sip-implementors] Question: Does 200 OK(INVITE) without SDP is valid response for INVITE with SDP offer?

2008-11-20 Thread NC Reddy
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Paul Kyzivat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NC Reddy wrote: I agreed it breaks the SDP offer/answer protocol, but i think it won't break SIP controlling protocol rules. The sip controlling protocol rules require that the o/a be completed. The context

[Sip-implementors] Question: Does 200 OK(INVITE) without SDP is valid response for INVITE with SDP offer?

2008-11-19 Thread NC Reddy
Hi, I have the following context question: UAC -AS(B2BUA) | --F1 (INVITE)--- * SDP-Offer* -F2: 100 Trying--- F3: 200 OK*(NO-SDP)* //Does this step is valid without SDP, ?: --F4:ACK Questions: - Does the 200 OK

Re: [Sip-implementors] Announcement - Utility to test SIP signaling

2008-11-19 Thread NC Reddy
How it different from SIPp? http://sipp.sourceforge.net/ On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Zarko Coklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: You can create a complex scenario and therefore automate testing. At the moment it is not supported to: a) have multiple calls at the same time b) load scenario, run

[Sip-implementors] Query: Regarding SDP offer/answer: Can UAS sends multiple answers for same offer

2008-05-08 Thread NC Reddy
Hi, I have the following question: - Can UAS sends multiple answers for same offer: - i.e 183 (Answer-1) - 180(Answer-2) - 200 Ok(Answer-2) Does the above UAS behavior is valid?. UseCase Scenario Context: - Make call along with feature code -UAC make call to AS (B2BUA)

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query: Regarding SDP offer/answer: Can UAS sends multiple answers for same offer

2008-05-08 Thread NC Reddy
) |---F6 180 (Ans-2) F7:180 Ans-2 ?? (Is it Valid)| Regards Channa On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: El Thursday 08 May 2008 15:45:53 NC Reddy escribió: Hi, I have the following question: - Can

[Sip-implementors] Query: How to derive Emergency Call from SIP INVITE Message

2008-02-29 Thread NC Reddy
Hi, I have the following queries regarding emergency call interpretation at SIP Application Server (SIP-AS). scenario: AP- Access Point AS - SIP Application server MGCF - Media Gateway Control Function (Softswitch ) PSAP - *Public Safety Answering Point

[Sip-implementors] Query: regarding content-type: multipart/mixed with single body in the list

2008-01-28 Thread NC Reddy
Hi, I have query regarding the multipart/mixed content-type. -Does it mandatory to have more than one body when content-Type is multipart/mixed?. The scenario i have is as follows: === UAC sends multipart/mixed as content-type with SDP+ privateData. B2BUA will

[Sip-implementors] Query: Regarding Authentication Flow between AS and UE in IMS network

2008-01-10 Thread NC Reddy
Hi, I have the following queries regarding Authentication flows between UE (User Equipment) and AS (Application Server) in IMS Network. Scenario:- UE- User Equipment SBC- Session Border Controller (B2BUA) CSCF -Call Session Control Functional AS- Application Server UE

[Sip-implementors] Query: Can INFO/MESSAGE method message send before 18x message in dialog

2008-01-07 Thread NC Reddy
Hi, I have the question on mid-dialog transactions initiated by UAS. UACUAS --F1 INVITE --- F2 100 Trying -- F3 MESSAGE (Mid-dialog i.e with To-Tag-- --F4 200 OK (MESSAGE)---

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query: Can UAS generate different messagebodytypes in 18x messages for INVITE.

2008-01-07 Thread NC Reddy
Hi, Thanks for update. I am re-framing the question as follows: Msg BODY 1 - NON-SDP Msg Body 2 -SDP BODY UAC UAS F1 INVITE--- F2 100 Trying F3 183 ( Msg BODY 1 (NON-SDP))--- ---F4 183/180 (MSG BODY 2