Forwarding to SIMPLE mailing list...
-Original Message-
From: Pandurangan R S [mailto:pandurangan@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 12:07 PM
To: Vavilapalli Srikanth-A19563
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Question on RFC 4662
: simple-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:simple-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Vavilapalli Srikanth-A19563
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 12:38 PM
To: Pandurangan R S; sim...@ietf.org
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Simple] [Sip-implementors] Question on RFC 4662 -
ResourceList
Hi
I have a question related to first NOTIFY being generated for a Resource
List Subscription assuming where the all the entities support only
unreliable UDP transport and message size is limitied by path MTU size
(because of for ex. No support for UDP fragmentation by the intermediate
routers on
, April 09, 2010 11:15 AM
To: Vavilapalli Srikanth-A19563
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Question on RFC 4662 - Resource List
Subscription
Hi Srikant
RFC 4662 mandates the presence of fullstate attribute in the NOTIFY
body. So if the NOTIFY message
To: Vavilapalli Srikanth-A19563; s...@ietf.org; s...@core3.amsl.com;
sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: RE: [Sip] Question on draft-ietf-sip-outbound-20 draft:
multipleflowcreation
I honestly don't know why anybody would want to do both UDP and TCP.
(In other words, if you set up
[mailto:au...@nortel.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 9:22 PM
To: Vavilapalli Srikanth-A19563; s...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Sip] Question on draft-ietf-sip-outbound-20 draft:
multiple flowcreation
You would have 2. One for primary, and one for secondary. For each one
of those, you would use normal
in case of SIP DIGEST auth mechanism.. Any clues?
Regards
Srikanth
From: Arnab Biswas [mailto:arnabbisw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 3:39 PM
To: Avasarala Ranjit-A20990; Vavilapalli Srikanth-A19563
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject
digest with/without TLS, those values should be empty.
Regards
Srikanth
-Original Message-
From: Avasarala Ranjit-A20990
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 2:34 PM
To: Vavilapalli Srikanth-A19563; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] nonce and response values
Hi
I have a question on 3GPP 24.229 specification related to IMS AKA as a
security mechanism.. As I have not received any replies in [IMSTech]
forum, wanted to get clarified with Sip Implementors.
Document: 24229-851.doc
1)Section 5.1.1.4.2 IMS AKA as a security mechanism: On sending a
