Re: [Sip-implementors] Codec Negotiation

2012-10-18 Thread Kumar Verma, Sunil (Sunil)
Please note that each UA will have preference setup for the codec supported in the system, based on other parameters like bandwidth utilization policy, quality of media, availability of DSP resources for the particular codec type, system traffic..etc. All these will govern such decision. Regards S

Re: [Sip-implementors] PRACK Response Time from UAS

2012-10-18 Thread Kumar Verma, Sunil (Sunil)
PRACK is considered as NON Invite Transaction, hence rules applicable to NON Invite transaction should apply. Refer to section 17.2.2 for all timer related query for the response. Regards Sunil Verma -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-imple

Re: [Sip-implementors] 18x response after OA complete?

2011-06-29 Thread Kumar Verma, Sunil (Sunil)
[mailto:nauman762-h...@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 1:55 PM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu; Kumar Verma, Sunil (Sunil) Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] 18x response after OA complete? Thank you. However can you confirn no more OA cycles can take place using the 18x and PRRACK response

Re: [Sip-implementors] 18x response after OA complete?

2011-06-28 Thread Kumar Verma, Sunil (Sunil)
Yes, it is allowed. If you see proxy and other entity, they need 18x response to retain the transaction(Timer C). Regards Sunil Verma -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Nauman Sulaima

Re: [Sip-implementors] Re-Invite codec renegotiation.

2011-06-28 Thread Kumar Verma, Sunil (Sunil)
Hi, I am not sure sending INVITE without SDP indicates call hold. Can you please refer to which section in 3261 refer the same? Invite without SDP can be considered as Request offer, and some time in these cases far end responds with Complete codec list. For call hold we need to either send INVITE

Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP request Cancel Issue

2011-04-20 Thread Verma Sunil
Hi Chandan, I think the call flow you have mentioned has few things unclear.. VOIP 1 is at fault by not sending ACK to 487. If Cancel is retransmitted then it seems 200 OK for cancel is not processed by VOIP 1. This might be reason for missing ACK. But if Cancel is retransmitted and for every

Re: [Sip-implementors] 482 loop detected.

2011-03-31 Thread Verma Sunil
I think he is refereeing to SIP client, it can be both UAC/UAS. Correct me if I am wrong. -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 5:30 PM To: sip

Re: [Sip-implementors] 482 loop detected.

2011-03-31 Thread Verma Sunil
In case the request sent by user is forked by proxy and received back by originator of request. There will be use cases when we use call handover features. Regards Sunil Verma -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.c

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding SDP answer in reliable 18x with inactive stream only

2010-12-01 Thread Verma Sunil
Hi Tarun, Port=0 is rejection of stream. Now if only one stream is offered and it is rejected then UAC can terminate the call. Regards Sunil Verma -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query regarding SDP attribute in a Call HoldResume Scenario

2010-11-29 Thread Verma Sunil
Answers inline: -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Tarun2 Gupta Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 4:45 PM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Query r

Re: [Sip-implementors] dynamic payload negotiation

2010-11-29 Thread Verma Sunil
Hi, Asymmetric payload is allowed in sip. As SDP is receive capability hence: A-> B (RFC2833 Payload :101) B-> A (RFC2833 Payload :96) Also based on what is negotiated the streaming will be using that payload. Regards Sunil Verma -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.

Re: [Sip-implementors] Question About terminating REFER Subscription

2010-10-05 Thread Verma Sunil
Hi, The first Notify due to implicit subscription will contain the expire time value for this subscription. If Subscription refresh request for is not sent before that Subscription will be considered terminated. Regards Sunil Verma -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@list

Re: [Sip-implementors] Can Notify with empty body be sent by NOTIFIERto Terminate REFER subscribtion?

2010-10-04 Thread Verma Sunil
Hi, The purpose of Subscription is to notify the Referring party about the state of the new call due to refer. This is mainly used to identify if call is successful or failed. Now based on response the referring party decided to terminates the call or retrieve the referred call. If before the co

Re: [Sip-implementors] Update time out

2010-10-04 Thread Verma Sunil
Hi, Is the call from UAC to UAS is via any proxy? Ideally proxy will be running Timer C which will reset to new value with 18x response, but I think it will not be more that 3 minutes. So Proxy should have dropped both leg of the call. Other way would be to use the Expire header in SIP Invite w

Re: [Sip-implementors] REFER Replaces and Referred-By

2010-09-28 Thread Verma Sunil
Hi Brandon, I think if UA1 is aware of both the call legs then it will be good to send Refered by as "us...@example.com". But please note that this is not mandatory. As there could be many other mechanism to identify and Authenticate the Referring party. "Referred-By" is one of the mechanism to A

Re: [Sip-implementors] Invite Client Transaction after it gets100trying

2010-09-26 Thread Verma Sunil
Hi Vivek, As you may have proxy in the network which would have responded back with 100 Trying and in turn have started timer C. Proxy will terminate both legs of the call, if there is no response to the request it has forwarded before timer C expire. Also at UAC level you can have expire header

Re: [Sip-implementors] why Do we need a 3 way handshake for INVITE atall?

2010-09-22 Thread Verma Sunil
Hi Abhishek, Can you elaborate more for three way handshakes and which part of three way handshakes you think is not required? 100 Trying can be generated even for Re-INVITE if the processing of the same is going to take more than 200ms. I don't think there is any such restriction in RFC for this

Re: [Sip-implementors] Call HOLD from both sides

2010-09-22 Thread Verma Sunil
Slight modification as I mentioned "sendrecv" at the at line instead if "receive-only". -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Verma Sunil Sent: Wednesday, September

Re: [Sip-implementors] Call HOLD from both sides

2010-09-22 Thread Verma Sunil
Hi, As per offer answer RFC for media attribute "send-only" response can be "receive-only" or "inactive". The choice is at the application to decide what needs to be done. >From the call scenario I think response should be "inactive" as BOB has put Alice on hold and has not yet retrieve the call.

Re: [Sip-implementors] sdp missing m line

2010-09-19 Thread Verma Sunil
Hi Anand, I agree with Paul. I am not sure why you have to put SDP and not m-line for Audio? Do you want to share other media attributes and not Audio? As per spec there could be many ways to initiate a call with hold attributes. You can use the rules mentioned below by Paul in offer as well.