On 11/3/14 7:59 PM, ankur bansal wrote:
Thanks Paul for the answer
But still not clear why ACK needs to be new transaction .Anyway TU only
sending ACK so multiple ACKs can be sent if multiple 200 come.
Do we have any better explanation for this .Also i was thinking if they
changed the 200 transac
Thanks Paul for the answer
But still not clear why ACK needs to be new transaction .Anyway TU only
sending ACK so multiple ACKs can be sent if multiple 200 come.
Do we have any better explanation for this .Also i was thinking if they
changed the 200 transaction handling from transaction terminate t
On 10/31/14 12:27 PM, ankur bansal wrote:
Hi All
Why ACK is made separate transaction when 2xx is final response.Reasons
being given that TL is deleted on getting 2xx to be independant of
upperlayer whether its UA core or proxy core.but now after rfc 6026 came TL
not deleted on getting 2xx.then
Hi All
Why ACK is made separate transaction when 2xx is final response.Reasons
being given that TL is deleted on getting 2xx to be independant of
upperlayer whether its UA core or proxy core.but now after rfc 6026 came TL
not deleted on getting 2xx.then whats the reason to keep ACK still new
trans
