Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header

2014-07-03 Thread Rajesh
edu [mailto: > sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 10:40 PM > To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header > > Is is silly and inappropriate to as

Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header

2014-07-02 Thread swaminathan.seetharaman
du Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header Is is silly and inappropriate to assert the validity of anonymous@anonymous.invalid, because there is no such domain. Hence nobody is in a position to make such an assertion. But it could be appropriate to assert sip:anonymous@so

Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header

2014-07-02 Thread Paul Kyzivat
--Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Rajesh Sent: July-02-14 12:17 PM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header Hi, May i kn

Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header

2014-07-02 Thread Brett Tate
> May i know whether it is valid to add > Anonymous URI (anonymous@anonymous.invalid) > in the PAI (P-Asserted-Identity) header filed. It likely depends upon what you mean by valid. Since anonymous@anonymous.invalid isn't a real identity (i.e. "invalid" reserved for special meaning), my understan

Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header

2014-07-02 Thread Joel Gerber
plementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Rajesh Sent: July-02-14 12:30 PM To: abhishek verma; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header Thanks Abhishek. Could you please send me

Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header

2014-07-02 Thread Rajesh
Thanks Abhishek. Could you please send me any references on this from RFCs and i would really appreciate if you can mention any scenario where we can see PAI header with anonymous URI Regards Rajesh On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:18 PM, abhishek verma wrote: > It is valid > > > On Wednesday, 2 July

Re: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header

2014-07-02 Thread Joel Gerber
tlink.ca T: 519.786.1241 -Original Message- From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Rajesh Sent: July-02-14 12:17 PM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI

[Sip-implementors] Anonymous URI in SIP PAI header

2014-07-02 Thread Rajesh
Hi, May i know whether it is valid to add Anonymous URI ( anonymous@anonymous.invalid) in the PAI (P-Asserted-Identity) header filed. Thanks Regards Rajesh ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.colum