From: "Amit P. Ahuja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Considering the behavior of UAS-2, my question is: whether any SIP
standard suggests guidelines on whether it is advisable to send out
responses from a UDP port which is different from the one on which
the request was received? RFC 3261 - 18
No for UDP protocol("udp") and same IP:port should be used, why ?
Most NATs are "port restricted cone" NAT, so they won't allow traffic in
from the end point to where you haven't send data.
라스토기 wrote:
>>Considering the behavior of UAS-2, my question is: whether any SIP
>> standard suggest
>Considering the behavior of UAS-2, my question is: whether any SIP
> standard suggests guidelines on whether it is advisable to send out responses
> from a UDP port which is different from the one on which the request was
> received? RFC 3261 - 18.2.2 Sending Responses only talks about the
Hello List Members,
Following is the scenario on which my question is based:
1> UAC-1 sends a REGISTER request using UDP from source port 20,000 to UAS-2 at
destination port 5060.
2> UAS-2 responds back with a 200 OK to above request from UDP source port
30,000 to destination port 20,000.
