Re: [Sip-implementors] Global URIs - different phone-contexts

2010-03-05 Thread Paul Kyzivat
Attila Sipos wrote: > So this leads me to another question: > > What is the practical difference between: > sip:+12345...@domain.org;user=phone > and > sip:+12345...@anotherdomain.org;user=phone and tel:+12345678 > ? > > Is it that in the first case, the request gets sent t

Re: [Sip-implementors] Global URIs - different phone-contexts

2010-03-05 Thread Victor Pascual Avila
The E.164 problem is described in draft-elwell-sip-e164-problem-statement Cheers, -Victor On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Attila Sipos wrote: > > In response to a question "[Sip-implementors] Global and local - SIP > URI", > it was written: > >>>If the SIP URI has a param ;user=phone then the us

Re: [Sip-implementors] Global URIs - different phone-contexts

2010-03-05 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
El Viernes 05 Marzo 2010, Attila Sipos escribió: > So this leads me to another question: > > What is the practical difference between: > sip:+12345...@domain.org;user=phone > and > sip:+12345...@anotherdomain.org;user=phone > ? > > Is it that in the first case, the request gets sent to "d

[Sip-implementors] Global URIs - different phone-contexts

2010-03-05 Thread Attila Sipos
In response to a question "[Sip-implementors] Global and local - SIP URI", it was written: >>If the SIP URI has a param ;user=phone then the userinfo part is supposed to >>be a telephone number, sharing syntax with the TEL URI. >> >>So you could consider the following SIP URI as "global" (in term