>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> >> Behalf Of praveen dandin
> >> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 12:13 AM
> >> To: Nebojsa Miljanovic
> >> Cc: Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> >> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Is
-Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of praveen dandin
>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 12:13 AM
>> To: Nebojsa Miljanovic
>> Cc: Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>> Subject: Re: [Sip-implemento
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
> Kyzivat
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 6:38 PM
> To: KASTURI Narayanan (kasnaray)
> Cc: praveen dandin; Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Is route set be recomputed w
er 19, 2007 6:38 PM
To: KASTURI Narayanan (kasnaray)
Cc: praveen dandin; Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Is route set be recomputed while sending
ACKfor retransmitted 2xx?
I agree with Kasturi regarding the meaning of that text. It allows a proxy
that record-rout
t; Behalf Of praveen dandin
>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 12:13 AM
>> To: Nebojsa Miljanovic
>> Cc: Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
>> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Is route set be recomputed
>> while sending ACKfor retransmitted 2xx?
>>
>> Than
nal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of praveen dandin
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 12:13 AM
> To: Nebojsa Miljanovic
> Cc: Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Is route set be recomputed
