On Thursday 20 May 2010 06:20:39 Vivek Batra wrote:
> Once the port has been resolved with DNS SRV, do we need to place the
> resolved port in URI before sending SIP message to the UAS? Or can we kept
> the port field blank?
> One more point, do we need to use the SRV domain (SIP domain for which
; Vivek Batra
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Iñaki Baz Castillo [mailto:i...@aliax.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 7:56 PM
> To: Victor Pascual Avila
> Cc: Vivek Batra; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Port/Domain - DNS SRV
>
edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Port/Domain - DNS SRV
2010/5/19 Victor Pascual Avila :
> sip:ip1 -> Send to ip1, port 5060 over UDP
>
> sip:ip1:portA -> Send to ip1, port A over UDP
>
> sip:ip1;transport=x -> Send to ip1, port 5060 over transport x
>
> sip:ip1
ors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Port/Domain - DNS SRV
2010/5/19 Victor Pascual Avila :
> sip:ip1 -> Send to ip1, port 5060 over UDP
>
> sip:ip1:portA -> Send to ip1, port A over UDP
>
> sip:ip1;transport=x -> Send to ip1, port 5060 over transport x
&g
@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Port/Domain - DNS SRV
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Vivek Batra
[vivek.ba...@matrixcomsec.com]
1. Is it best practice not to
2010/5/19 Victor Pascual Avila :
> sip:ip1 -> Send to ip1, port 5060 over UDP
>
> sip:ip1:portA -> Send to ip1, port A over UDP
>
> sip:ip1;transport=x -> Send to ip1, port 5060 over transport x
>
> sip:ip1:portA;transport=x -> Send to ip1, port A over transport x
>
> sip:FQDN -> Resolve by D
Hi,
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Vivek Batra
wrote:
> Is there any harm if we don't include the SIP port in Request-URI, To and
> >From field (of REGISTER etc) when SIP domain port is resolved using DNS SRV
> query?
sip:ip1 -> Send to ip1, port 5060 over UDP
sip:ip1:portA -> Send to ip
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Vivek Batra
[vivek.ba...@matrixcomsec.com]
1. Is it best practice not to include the SIP Port in Request-URI, To
and From field (of REG
Hi friends,
Please suggest on following issues related to DNS SRV;
1. Is it best practice not to include the SIP Port in Request-URI, To
and From field (of REGISTER, INVITE etc) when SIP domain port is resolved
using DNS SRV query?
Is there any harm if we don't include the SIP port
