Of amrita
> chaudhary
> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 10:10 AM
> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Precondition negotiation in re-INVITE
>
> Hi,
> Is it possible to do precondition negotiation in re-INVITE when first leg of
> the
> call is
ntors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of amrita chaudhary
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 11:10 AM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Precondition negotiation in re-INVITE
Hi,
Is it possible to do precondition negotiation in re-INVITE when first leg
of
t
y, July 22, 2016 11:10 AM
> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Precondition negotiation in re-INVITE
>
> Hi,
> Is it possible to do precondition negotiation in re-INVITE when first leg
> of
> the call is established?Scenario: AS connects A-part
1:10 AM
> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Precondition negotiation in re-INVITE
>
> Hi,
> Is it possible to do precondition negotiation in re-INVITE when first leg
> of
> the call is established?Scenario: AS connects A-party to C-par
s-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu [mailto:sip-
> implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of amrita chaudhary
> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 11:10 AM
> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Precondition negotiation in re-INVITE
>
> Hi,
> Is it
Hi,
Is it possible to do precondition negotiation in re-INVITE when first leg of
the call is established?Scenario: AS connects A-party to C-party after B-party
(which was in conversation with A) is released.A, B and C are VoLTE terminals.
Does anybody has done this in their implementation.
Rega
