I spoke with an MX-One developer and his initial response was that their PBX
handles this incorrectly and PAI should contain the new B-part.
Waiting for a fix.
Thanks guys.
/Roger
Sent from my iPhone
> On 12 May 2015, at 18:08, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>
> ISTM that this is a value judgement on t
ISTM that this is a value judgement on the part of the PBX - exactly how
it thinks its transfer feature should work. In particular, does it
*want* to disclose to the caller that a transfer has occurred.
Thanks,
Paul
On 5/12/15 11:55 AM, ankur bansal wrote:
Hi Roger
Cisco PBX
Hi Roger
Cisco PBX behavior seems correct here .Also after transfer is complete in
step 3 ,
Phone-A is out of picture after having BYE exchange with Phone-B and PBX.
So during step 4, PBX should use PAI of Phone-B.
Regards
Ankur Bansal
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Roger Wiklund
wrote:
> Hi
Hi folks!
Scenario:
ITSP--PBX--PHONE-A--PHONE-B
1. Call from PSTN via ITSP to PHONE-A (via B2BUA PBX)
2. PHONE-A answers the call
3. PHONE-A makes a supervised transfer to PHONE-B (REFER within the PBX)
4. PBX sends UPDATE/Re-INVITE to ITSP with updated SDP co
