Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on RFC 3680.

2008-12-08 Thread Paul Kyzivat
I agree with all Dale has said on this. Adding to that - it is also possible that there is *another* device that is sending register or unregister requests for the *same* contacts as your UA. Its not a *likely* scenario in most cases, but it is *possible*. This can lead to all sorts of odd stat

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on RFC 3680.

2008-12-07 Thread Dale Worley
> <> > The contacts A1 & A2 from the UA's perspective are just different ways > to get a call delivered to it. UA does not intend to prioritize one over > the other. What would be the need for the server in this case to return > different expires. While I understand that theoretically it is possibl

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on RFC 3680.

2008-12-07 Thread P Sudarshanakrishnan-A14377
Inline a couple of clarifications -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 10:10 PM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on RFC 3680. From: &q

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on RFC 3680.

2008-12-07 Thread Dale . Worley
From: "P Sudarshanakrishnan-A14377" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Assuming A registers contacts A1, A2. When a network entity initiates a notification I am not sure if there is a possibility that it indicates different attributes (say rejected for A1 and probation for A2) for the individual c

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on RFC 3680.

2008-12-06 Thread P Sudarshanakrishnan-A14377
f Of Paul Kyzivat Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 2:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on RFC 3680. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >From: "Naarumanchi Kaushik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >According to RF

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on RFC 3680.

2008-12-05 Thread Paul Kyzivat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >From: "Naarumanchi Kaushik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >According to RFC 3680, when a user subscribes for reg event package, he >would receive notifications for any state change in the registered contacts >under that AOR. > >If an AOR is registered with

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on RFC 3680.

2008-12-05 Thread Dale . Worley
From: "Naarumanchi Kaushik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> According to RFC 3680, when a user subscribes for reg event package, he would receive notifications for any state change in the registered contacts under that AOR. If an AOR is registered with multiple contacts and then subscribed to

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on RFC 3680.

2008-12-05 Thread Avasarala Ranjit-A20990
ay, December 05, 2008 2:34 PM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Query on RFC 3680. Hi All, According to RFC 3680, when a user subscribes for reg event package, he would receive notifications for any state change in the registered contacts under that AOR. If an AOR is registered

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on RFC 3680.

2008-12-05 Thread Avasarala Ranjit-A20990
ay, December 05, 2008 2:34 PM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Query on RFC 3680. Hi All, According to RFC 3680, when a user subscribes for reg event package, he would receive notifications for any state change in the registered contacts under that AOR. If an AOR is registered

Re: [Sip-implementors] Query on RFC 3680.

2008-12-05 Thread Tarun2 Gupta
:34 PM To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Query on RFC 3680. Hi All, According to RFC 3680, when a user subscribes for reg event package, he would receive notifications for any state change in the registered contacts under that AOR. If an AOR is

[Sip-implementors] Query on RFC 3680.

2008-12-05 Thread Naarumanchi Kaushik
Hi All, According to RFC 3680, when a user subscribes for reg event package, he would receive notifications for any state change in the registered contacts under that AOR. If an AOR is registered with multiple contacts and then subscribed to reg event package, is it possible to receive notificati