I agree with Dale. In addition, having the UAC do it this way makes the
downstream behavior the same whether the recursion on the 300 is done by
the UAC or by a proxy on the path.
Thanks,
Paul
Dale Worley wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 18:32 +0200, Francisco José Méndez Cirera w
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 18:32 +0200, Francisco José Méndez Cirera wrote:
> A question about the CALL-ID.
>
> 1. UAC sends an INVITE request to Redirect Server with CALL-ID: abc.
> 2. Redirect server sends response "300 Multiples Choices".
> 3. UAC makes a pararell search sending three IN
El 11/05/2009, a las 18:56, "Scott Lawrence"
escribió:
> On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 18:32 +0200, Francisco José Méndez Cirera wrot
> e:
>> A question about the CALL-ID.
>>
>>1. UAC sends an INVITE request to Redirect Server with CALL-ID:
>> abc.
>>2. Redirect server sends response "300
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 18:32 +0200, Francisco José Méndez Cirera wrote:
> A question about the CALL-ID.
>
> 1. UAC sends an INVITE request to Redirect Server with CALL-ID: abc.
> 2. Redirect server sends response "300 Multiples Choices".
> 3. UAC makes a pararell search sending three IN
A question about the CALL-ID.
1. UAC sends an INVITE request to Redirect Server with CALL-ID: abc.
2. Redirect server sends response "300 Multiples Choices".
3. UAC makes a pararell search sending three INVITES with CALL-ID:
¿abc?.
I dont understand why first INVITE and three last INV
