On 09/13/2011 08:18 AM, Francis Joanis wrote:
> This is what I was "afraid" of, since there seems to be multiple ways
> of doing it (although only one preferred way, I guess), UAs need to be
> flexible and need to be able to handle the different cases.
This is the very nature of SIP; only a few r
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> On 9/12/11 12:03 PM, Francis Joanis wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Apologies if this has been answered before...
>>
>> I have a question about when the BYE between the Transferor and the
>> Transferee is sent in the case of an unattended transfer.
>>
>>
On 9/12/11 12:03 PM, Francis Joanis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies if this has been answered before...
>
> I have a question about when the BYE between the Transferor and the
> Transferee is sent in the case of an unattended transfer.
>
> RFC 5589 says in Section 6 that "[the transferor] could emit a B
Hi,
Apologies if this has been answered before...
I have a question about when the BYE between the Transferor and the
Transferee is sent in the case of an unattended transfer.
RFC 5589 says in Section 6 that "[the transferor] could emit a BYE to
the Transferee as soon as the REFER transaction co
