I have the following scenario:
Incoming invite has Privacy:id along From header
carrying Display Name
Where as the outgoing INVITE has From Header set
sip:Anonymous@Anonymous.invalid whereas the
display-name goes as it is.
Is there any draft mentioning about this behavior
On 9/9/11 1:27 AM, prakash k wrote:
Hi All,
I have the following scenario:
Incoming invite has Privacy:id along From header carrying Display Name
Where as the outgoing INVITE has From Header set
sip:Anonymous@Anonymous.invalid whereas the display-name goes as it is.
Is there any draft
From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu
[sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of prakash k
[prakash12...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 10:57 AM
To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Display Name when
@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Display Name when Privacy:id
Hi Vivek,
4.1.1.1 Display-Names
It is a relatively common practice in email and other applications to
use an assumed name in the display-name component of the From header
field. Outside
[prakash12...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 11:41 AM
To: Vivek Talwar
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Display Name when Privacy:id
Hi Vivek,
setup is
SBC sits between two different network, since it acts at B2BUA
from one network
Hi All,
I have the following scenario:
Incoming invite has Privacy:id along From header carrying Display Name
Where as the outgoing INVITE has From Header set
sip:Anonymous@Anonymous.invalid whereas the display-name goes as it is.
Is there any draft mentioning about this behavior handling.
