Re: [Sip-implementors] Registrar behaviour

2009-03-20 Thread Paul Kyzivat
- >>> From: sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu >>> [mailto:sip-implementors-boun...@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On >>> Behalf Of ext Somesh S. Shanbhag >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 2:14 AM >>> To: Somesh S. Shanbhag; Avasarala Ranjit-A2099

Re: [Sip-implementors] Registrar behaviour

2009-03-19 Thread Singh, Indresh (NSN - US/Boca Raton)
Ranjit-A20990; Rastogi, >>Vipul (Vipul); sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu >>Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Registrar behaviour >> >>Oops! I used REGISTER in the place of registrar :) >> >>Somesh >> >>* Please do not take print out of this e-

Re: [Sip-implementors] Registrar behaviour

2009-03-17 Thread Somesh S. Shanbhag
@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Registrar behaviour If the REGISTER has authorized the client and finds no bindings in it, may be its case where REGISTER might have been rebooted or some means lost the bindings. So, it can honour the De-Registration easily and send 200 OK for

Re: [Sip-implementors] Registrar behaviour

2009-03-17 Thread Somesh S. Shanbhag
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 11:19 AM To: Rastogi, Vipul (Vipul); sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Registrar behaviour It will be good to send 200 OK for that REGISTER. Somesh * Please do not take print out of this e-mail unless its absolutely necessary

Re: [Sip-implementors] Registrar behaviour

2009-03-17 Thread Avasarala Ranjit-A20990
18, 2009 11:19 AM To: Rastogi, Vipul (Vipul); sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Registrar behaviour It will be good to send 200 OK for that REGISTER. Somesh * Please do not take print out of this e-mail unless its absolutely necessary * -Original

Re: [Sip-implementors] Registrar behaviour

2009-03-17 Thread Anuradha Gupta
: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Registrar behaviour What shall registrar sends if UAC sends REGISTER to remove binding whose binding does not exists on registrar ? Thanks, Vipul ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip

Re: [Sip-implementors] Registrar behaviour

2009-03-17 Thread Somesh S. Shanbhag
-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [Sip-implementors] Registrar behaviour What shall registrar sends if UAC sends REGISTER to remove binding whose binding does not exists on registrar ? Thanks, Vipul ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip

[Sip-implementors] Registrar behaviour

2009-03-17 Thread Rastogi, Vipul (Vipul)
What shall registrar sends if UAC sends REGISTER to remove binding whose binding does not exists on registrar ? Thanks, Vipul ___ Sip-implementors mailing list Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-i