Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP reject in 200 OK

2007-12-21 Thread Raj Jain
Yes. Thank you. -- Raj On Dec 20, 2007 8:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Raj Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] But, I can understand Dale's response. So, you can accept an SDP offer (by sending back a 200 instead of a 488), while you may reject every media stream in the offer (by

Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP reject in 200 OK

2007-12-20 Thread Dale . Worley
From: Harsha. R [EMAIL PROTECTED] If a UAC makes an SDP offer in RE-INVITE, can the offer be rejected in a 200 OK? No, of necessity, the SDP in a 200 OK is an SDP answer (if the INVITE contained an offer), and that SDP takes effect in the dialog. *However*, the SDP might include a

Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP reject in 200 OK

2007-12-20 Thread Raj Jain
Interesting. I though the answer to that question was YES. But, I can understand Dale's response. So, you can accept an SDP offer (by sending back a 200 instead of a 488), while you may reject every media stream in the offer (by setting each m= line port equals to 0 in the answer). I'd have

[Sip-implementors] SDP reject in 200 OK

2007-12-19 Thread Harsha. R
Hi, If a UAC makes an SDP offer in RE-INVITE, can the offer be rejected in a 200 OK? So my basic question is, can SDP rejects be placed in 200 OK to a request containing the offer, or is it mandated that SDP rejects need to be placed in non-2XX responses only Regards Harsha

Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP reject in 200 OK

2007-12-19 Thread Srinivas
Hi All, Adding to your query, if a session between UAC and UAS is in progress and UAC wishes to add a resource type to the existing session. So UAC sends a re-INVITE to the UAS and UAS responds with a 200 OK. Now my query is, whether there will be a case in which, the answer sent in the 200