On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 15:14 +0530, Anuradha Gupta wrote:
> My query is that on receiving 380 response, what should be the
> possible handling
> 1. Terminating the call and initiating new request for alternate
> service after interpreting the message body.
> 2. Redirecting the Call request to re
2009/3/27 Anuradha Gupta :
> Hi
>
> As per RFC 3261
> ---
> 21.3.5 380 Alternative Service
>
> The call was not successful, but alternative services are possible.
>
> The alternative services are described in the message body of the
> response. Formats
example of 380 response.
Regards
Anuradha Gupta
Aricent
-Original Message-
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo [mailto:i...@aliax.net]
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 2:53 PM
To: Anuradha Gupta
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP 380 response
2009/3/27 Anuradha
Iñaki
Baz Castillo
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 2:53 PM
To: Anuradha Gupta
Cc: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP 380 response
2009/3/27 Anuradha Gupta :
> Hi
>
> What should be the handling for SIP 380 response? Should it be handled as
other 3xx respo
2009/3/27 Anuradha Gupta :
> Hi
>
> What should be the handling for SIP 380 response? Should it be handled as
> other 3xx response or it should be treated as a call failure.
380 is not a response code, but a warning code defined in:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sip-sips
Hi
What should be the handling for SIP 380 response? Should it be handled as other
3xx response or it should be treated as a call failure.
Regards
Anuradha Gupta
Aricent
"DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for
the us
